2021
DOI: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of endometriosis

Abstract: Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that can cause pelvic pain and infertility. It usually affects 2% to 10% of women of reproductive age [1]. In 2010, the prevalence of endometriosis in women aged 15 to 49 years was about 1.7 billion worldwide [2]. According to a survey conducted by Statistics Korea, the number of patients who visited the hospital for endometriosis was about 100,000 in 2016 and 120,000 in 2018, and is gradually increasing [3]. With the rising trend of endometriosis, medical expens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subtle and typical are the most common types of endometriosis-most prevalent among women with chronic pelvic pain or infertility (80% and 50%, respectively)-followed by cystic (25%) and deep (5%) endometriosis. Through laparoscopy and histological confirmation, surgical staging of endometriosis takes into account the location, extent, and depth of lesions on a cumulative scoring system: Stage I (minimal, 1-5 points), Stage II (mild, 6-15 points), Stage III (moderate, 16-40 points), and Stage IV (severe, >40 points) [1,23,24]. Staging does not necessarily take into account endometriosis outside of the pelvic region, and it is utilized more to assess reproductive potential than the severity of symptoms or the impact on quality of life.…”
Section: Epidemiology Natural History and Comorbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtle and typical are the most common types of endometriosis-most prevalent among women with chronic pelvic pain or infertility (80% and 50%, respectively)-followed by cystic (25%) and deep (5%) endometriosis. Through laparoscopy and histological confirmation, surgical staging of endometriosis takes into account the location, extent, and depth of lesions on a cumulative scoring system: Stage I (minimal, 1-5 points), Stage II (mild, 6-15 points), Stage III (moderate, 16-40 points), and Stage IV (severe, >40 points) [1,23,24]. Staging does not necessarily take into account endometriosis outside of the pelvic region, and it is utilized more to assess reproductive potential than the severity of symptoms or the impact on quality of life.…”
Section: Epidemiology Natural History and Comorbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation remained unaddressed in subsequent ASRM score revisions. Although the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) (4) was subsequently developed to predict fertility outcomes and shown to have superior results, neither the ASRM score nor EFI were designed to reflect surgical complexity (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When staged according to the AAGL system, 18.7% (n=230), 26.2% (n=321), 12.0% (n=148) and 42.9% (n=525) of patients had stage I, II, III and IV disease, respectively. When staged according to the ASRM system, 23.2% (n=285), 24.4% (n=299), 17.6% (n=215) and 34.7% (n=425) of patients had stage I, II, III and IV disease, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Aagl With Asrm Staging Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the VAS scores of the 50 patients, 14 patients (aged 39.51±6.02 years) had a VAS score of 0 (non-pain group), while 36 patients (aged 36.93±7.28 years) had different levels of VAS scores (pain group). EM was staged according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification (17). Of the patients with EM, 11 had stage 1 disease, 14 had stage 2, 13 had stage 3 and 12 had stage 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%