1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00213647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Erythrina provenances by rumen degradation characteristics of dry matter and nitrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a very low content of condensed tannins (1 and 2 g/kg DM) was reported by Kaitho et al (1998) for E. burana and E. abyssinica, respectively. The high apparent digestibility of CP (72%) in sole E. brucei-supplemented goats in the current result suggests low levels of anti-nutritional factors, which is consistent with the result of Larbi et al (1996).…”
Section: Apparent Digestibility Of Nutrientssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, a very low content of condensed tannins (1 and 2 g/kg DM) was reported by Kaitho et al (1998) for E. burana and E. abyssinica, respectively. The high apparent digestibility of CP (72%) in sole E. brucei-supplemented goats in the current result suggests low levels of anti-nutritional factors, which is consistent with the result of Larbi et al (1996).…”
Section: Apparent Digestibility Of Nutrientssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The CP content of E. brucei was within the range of CP (207-285 g/kg DM) reported for nine ILCA accessions (Larbi et al 1996). However, the CP content of E. brucei was higher than those reported for Erythrina abyssinica (Larbi et al 1993;Kaitho et al 1998) and Erythrina burana (Kaitho et al 1998).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Feedssupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Differences could also exist among provenances of the same spp. in yield and fodder quality (Larbi et al 1996(Larbi et al , 1998, but his study focused on inter-species variations in fodder, wood and seed yield and fodder quality. Accordingly, provenance evaluation of the promising shrubs in the current study may be needed.…”
Section: Relationships Between Determinants Of Fodder Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%