2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11852-012-0223-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of floristic composition of mangrove forests using hyperspectral data: case study of Bhitarkanika National Park, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVM is an advanced supervised non-parametric classifier that has been extensively used for hyperspectral image classification [76,89,90], including mangrove species classification [51,52]. Based on statistical learning theory, SVM is designed to look for an optimal decision hyperplane in high-dimensional space, which produces an optimal separation of classes.…”
Section: Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SVM is an advanced supervised non-parametric classifier that has been extensively used for hyperspectral image classification [76,89,90], including mangrove species classification [51,52]. Based on statistical learning theory, SVM is designed to look for an optimal decision hyperplane in high-dimensional space, which produces an optimal separation of classes.…”
Section: Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on mangrove species classification were conducted using pixel-based methods such as spectral angle mapper (SAM) [45,46], maximum likelihood classification (MLC) [7,8,46], and spectral unmixing [47][48][49], or object-based methods, such as nearest neighbor (NN) [20,21], random forest (RF) [50], and support vector machine (SVM) [14,51,52]. Previous studies have shown that the object-based methods generally outperformed the pixel-based methods for mangrove species classification, particularly with high-resolution hyperspectral images [21,[53][54][55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also concluded that the hyperspectral images are very useful in discriminating mangrove wetlands, and having a finer spectral and spatial resolution can be crucial in investigating fine details of ground features. Kumar et al [35] used the five most dominant classes of mangrove species present in Bhitarkanika as training sets to classify using SAM on Hyperion hyperspectral images, and archived an OA of 0.64. Ashokkumar and Shanmugam [36] demonstrated the influence of band selection in data fusion technique; they performed classification using support vector machine and observed that factor based ranking approach shown better results (R 2 of 0.85) in discriminating mangrove species than other statistical approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral discrimination had been studied by utilizing field and lab reflectance data of various vegetation types such as agricultural crops (Song et al, 2011), Mediterranean species (Manevski et al, 2011) and also coastal vegetation including mangroves (Manjunath et al, 2013;Panigrahy et al, 2012;Schmidt and Skidmore, 2003;Vaiphasa et al, 2005). Apart from that both airborne and satellite based hyperspectral image data were used to discriminate mangrove species at finer levels (Held et al, 2003;Hirano et al, 2003;Koedsin and Vaiphasa, 2013;Kumar et al, 2013). Some studies were conducted based on the derivative spectral analysis of hyperspectral data such as conifer species identification using in-situ spectral data of range 350 nm to 1050 nm (Gong et al, 1997), optimal band selection for wetland species identification using second derivative spectra (Becker et al, 2005) and identifying plant stress caused due to gas leaks using derivative spectral ratios in red edge region (Smith et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%