2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3115405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of fNIRS Finger Tapping Data With Multi-Labeling and Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these 2D images as input into a CNN, they achieved an 8% increase in accuracy on an n-back (a classic experiment for measuring mental workload) classification task, compared to a DNN model with flattened input layer. Sommer et al arranged HD-fNIRS measurements in two areas of interest corresponding to the left and right primary motor cortices, and within these regions according to the SDS [29]. Rolling window samples of these images were used to train a CNN-LSTM model to predict finger-opposition laterality and frequency, achieving average accuracy of 0.81 over eleven subjects.…”
Section: Spatial-temporal Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these 2D images as input into a CNN, they achieved an 8% increase in accuracy on an n-back (a classic experiment for measuring mental workload) classification task, compared to a DNN model with flattened input layer. Sommer et al arranged HD-fNIRS measurements in two areas of interest corresponding to the left and right primary motor cortices, and within these regions according to the SDS [29]. Rolling window samples of these images were used to train a CNN-LSTM model to predict finger-opposition laterality and frequency, achieving average accuracy of 0.81 over eleven subjects.…”
Section: Spatial-temporal Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other neuroimaging techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), fNIRS provides better spatial and temporal resolutions, respectively [ 3 , 4 ]. Thus, a wide range of studies in different cognitive tasks and clinical settings have employed fNIRS, e.g., [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also employ more appropriate evaluation strategies for the second barrier. K-fold crossvalidation (KFold-CV) is used to evaluate test results, whereas leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV) is used to assess model generalization and individual differences [9], [12], [13]. For LOSO-CV, one subject's data serves as a test set, and the rest serves as a training set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-the-art visual models based on Transformers [15], [16], [20] and multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) [21], [22] are introduced into comparison experiments. Unlike recent studies [6], [7], [11], [12], our work is more devoted to demonstrating the generality of the proposed framework. The rest of this paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%