2015
DOI: 10.1515/eko-2015-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Land Use Changes (Model Area: Nitra Town)

Abstract: Haladová I., Petrovič F.: Classification of land use changes (model area: Nitra town). Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 249-259, 2015. This paper deals with the new classification of land use changes. We chose Nitra town in Slovakia as a model area. We examined changes of land use for the period 2003-2013. The main result of this work is a table for types of land use changes and a map that shows the location of these changes in Nitra town. Nitra is constantly expanding its area and it is also signi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All this leads to the ever more serious fragmentation of the landscape and the habitats, the appearance of an increasing number of degraded surfaces and vegetations, the disappearance of alleys and groups of trees beside the roads, which makes the landscape more homogenous and boring, and thereby less valuable. We agree with Haladová and Petrovič (2015) who monitored the land use changes in the model area of Nitra.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…All this leads to the ever more serious fragmentation of the landscape and the habitats, the appearance of an increasing number of degraded surfaces and vegetations, the disappearance of alleys and groups of trees beside the roads, which makes the landscape more homogenous and boring, and thereby less valuable. We agree with Haladová and Petrovič (2015) who monitored the land use changes in the model area of Nitra.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Changes occurred only at the point of evident changes in their overlap with the historical orthophoto map. This method is useful particularly for identification of changes in landscape cover and structure (Boltižiar, 2007;Falťan, Bánovský, 2008;Solár, 2013;Solár, Janiga, 2013;Haladová, Petrovič, 2015;Kaczka et al, 2015;Kubinský et al, 2015), but it seems to be applicable for the assessment of geomorphological processes (Kapusta et al, 2010;Hreško et al, 2012;Długosz, Kapusta, 2015) and dynamics of lake shorelines (Kapusta, 2016). When digitizing the data in GIS (shorelines in this case), only a copy of the original layer, not the completely new layer is created.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Prabaharan et al, 2010); (Haladová and Petrovič, 2015), LULCC along with GIS and Remote Sensing data are employed in studies to detect changes that have occurred in a particular area over the years. The same method has been used by several other researchers such as (Santillan, Makinano and Paringit, 2010); (Haladová and Petrovič, 2015); (Khan et al, 2016); (Dami and Mayomi, 2016); (Abu Ghurah et al, 2018) and (Rahman, 2019), to quantify the extent of land use and land cover changes. Following this, the huge role of remote sensing and GIS in advancing research in land-use and land-cover change analysis cannot be downplayed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%