Classification of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Using American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines: Agreement among Echocardiographers

Abstract

Guidelines for assessing diastolic function by echocardiography are continually being updated. Our ability to use available guidelines effectively has not been completely investigated. Six trained echocardiographers were asked to interpret 105 echocardiograms using current American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithms for interpretation of diastolic grade and estimation of left atrial (LA) pressure. Diastolic grade was categorized as normal, mild, moderate, or severe dysfunction. The presence or absence of elevated LA pressure was determined using a second ASE algorithm. As a reference comparison for level of agreement, left ventricular ejection fraction was visually determined. By the ASE algorithm, 29 subjects (28%) met all measurement criteria in their assigned grade and 57 subjects (55%) met all or all but one criterion of their assigned grade. Of the 45 subjects (43%) for whom the guidelines disagreed by more than 1 criterion, the readers debated between normal and moderate dysfunction in 22% or mild and moderate diastolic dysfunction in 31%. Percent inter-reader agreement and kappa values were 76% (0.7) for determining diastolic grade, 84% (0.67) for determining elevated LA pressure, and 84% (0.67) for estimation of ejection fraction, the reference standard. For all subjects, if multiple echocardiographic criteria failed to fit into the proposed guidelines, agreement fell to 66% (0.58) for determining diastolic grade and 74% (0.48) for determining LA pressure. There is reasonable agreement estimating diastolic grade and LA pressure using current guidelines. Further refinements in the definition of mild and moderate dysfunction may improve agreement.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is independently associated with early left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes

“…However, given the relatively small sample size of that study (n = 50), we were unable to fully adjust for other potential confounders, such as kidney function and echocardiographic parameters. Additionally, it is important to note that the diagnosis of LVDD using only an altered E/e' ratio and not accounting for other echocardiographic parameters could be challenged [16,24]. To our knowledge, this is the largest cross-sectional study aimed at examining the association between NAFLD and LVDD in an outpatient sample of type 2 diabetic individuals.…”

Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in Dependence of Left Atrial Volume Index

“…Diastolic function. Left ventricular diastolic filling was determined by Doppler-derived measurements (18,19). Mitral inflow velocity was assessed using Doppler echocardiography from apical 4 chamber view, keeping the sample volume at the tips of the mitral leaflets.…”

The role and clinical implications of diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis

“…Ηowever, their interpretation is based on additional echocardiographic measurements such as LV mass, ejection fraction, valvular disease and is related to age, gender and the clinical setting. As a result, diastolic echocardiographic variables are often non-concurrent and can be interpreted differently 15. The American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging have recently updated their guidelines in an attempt to simplify the evaluation of diastolic dysfunction and recommend a practical, standardised scheme for diagnosis and grading of diastolic dysfunction 1 16.…”