We designed a location-context-semantics-based conditional random field (LCS-CRF) framework for the semantic classification of airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds. For ALS datasets of high spatial resolution but with severe noise pollutions, more contexture and semantics cues, besides location information, can be exploited to surmount the decrease of discrimination of features for classification. This paper mainly focuses on the semantic classification of ALS data using mixed location-context-semantics cues, which are integrated into a higher-order CRF framework by modeling the probabilistic potentials. The location cues modeled by the unary potentials can provide basic information for discriminating the various classes. The pairwise potentials consider the spatial contextual information by establishing the neighboring interactions between points to favor spatial smoothing. The semantics cues are explicitly encoded in the higher-order potentials. The higher-order potential operates at the clusters level with similar geometric and radiometric properties, guaranteeing the classification accuracy based on semantic rules. To demonstrate the performance of our approach, two standard benchmark datasets were utilized. Experiments show that our method achieves superior classification results with an overall accuracy of 83.1% on the Vaihingen Dataset and an overall accuracy of 94.3% on the Graphics and Media Lab (GML) Dataset A compared with other classification algorithms in the literature. 2 of 28 from different equipment. Therefore, we incorporate location, spatial contextual, and semantics cues within a higher-order conditional random field (CRF) framework to provide complementary information from varying perspectives, so that it can address the common misjudgment of semantic classes in ALS point clouds, from the perspectives of the accuracy of each class and the overall accuracy.
Related Works for ALS Point Cloud ClassificationAccording to the type of entity used for classification, existing methods can be categorized as point-based and cluster-based (or segment-based) [2,3]. Point-based methods classify each point of the ALS data by using features as the inputs for supervised or unsupervised classifiers [4], while cluster-based methods segment the ALS data into clusters, then class labels are assigned to the clusters in which all points share the same class label [5,6]. We briefly review the aforementioned methods, and demonstrate the rationale for our method in what follows.Point-based methods generally extract point-wise features locally from the neighborhood defined by a sphere or cylinder. Therefore, such methods usually focus on the selection of discriminative features and effective classifiers. For instance, Reference [7] worked on 3D scene analysis, including geometric features extraction and optimal neighbors selection. Then an optimal eigenentropy-based scale selection method was proposed. Reference [2] combined airborne LiDAR with images to extract more discriminative features. Then, based on these ...