2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of medicinal plants: An approach using modified LBP with symbolic representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, researchers in computer vision have used leaves as a comparative tool to classify plants [7,8,9,10]. Characters such as shape [11,12,13], texture [14,15,16] and venation [17,18] are the features most generally used to distinguish the leaves of different species. The history of plant identification methods, however shows that existing plant identification solutions are highly dependent on the ability of experts to encode domain knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, researchers in computer vision have used leaves as a comparative tool to classify plants [7,8,9,10]. Characters such as shape [11,12,13], texture [14,15,16] and venation [17,18] are the features most generally used to distinguish the leaves of different species. The history of plant identification methods, however shows that existing plant identification solutions are highly dependent on the ability of experts to encode domain knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.14 compares accuracies of approach [12] (blue) with current approach (red). Hierarchical clustering used in [5] clusters the leaf images depending on the similarity of the texture. If the image of the leaf does not contain any prominent structure or if the quality of the scanned data is poor, then this method of clustering the images depending the texture does not produce better recognition rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall accuracy is 47.2%. Fig.15 compares accuracies of approach [5] (blue) with current approach (red). Fig.15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations