2003
DOI: 10.21236/ada459757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Mixtures of Spatial Point Processes via Partial Bayes Factors

Abstract: Motivated by the problem of minefield detection, we investigate the problem of classifying mixtures of spatial point processes. In particular we are interested in testing the hypothesis that a given dataset was generated by a Poisson process versus a mixture of a Poisson process and a hard-core Strauss process. We propose testing this hypothesis by comparing the evidence for each model by using partial Bayes factors. We use the term partial Bayes factor to describe a Bayes factor, a ratio of integrated likelih… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another relevant instance outside the ABC domain is provided in Dickey and Gunel (1978), who exhibit the above differences in the Bayes factors when using a non-sufficient statistic, including an example where the limiting Bayes factor, as the sample size grows to infinity, is 0 or ∞. Similarly, Walsh and Raftery (2005) compare point processes via Bayes factors constructed on summary statistics. They discuss those summary statistics (second order statistics and some based on Voronoï tesselations) depending on the misclassification rates of the corresponding Bayes factors through a simulation study.…”
Section: Summary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another relevant instance outside the ABC domain is provided in Dickey and Gunel (1978), who exhibit the above differences in the Bayes factors when using a non-sufficient statistic, including an example where the limiting Bayes factor, as the sample size grows to infinity, is 0 or ∞. Similarly, Walsh and Raftery (2005) compare point processes via Bayes factors constructed on summary statistics. They discuss those summary statistics (second order statistics and some based on Voronoï tesselations) depending on the misclassification rates of the corresponding Bayes factors through a simulation study.…”
Section: Summary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the connection with the genuine Bayes factor was not pursued. (A connection with the ABC setting appears in the conclusion of Walsh and Raftery (), though, with a reference to Diggle and Gratton (), which is often credited as one originator of the method. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the superposition of arrival processes is used to analyze voice data in (Sriram & Whitt, 1986). More recently, Bayesian-based methods are proposed for classifying source processes from superposed observations (Walsh & Raftery, 2005), and their learning algorithms can be implemented based on MCMC (Redenbach et al, 2015) or variational inference (Rajala et al, 2016). However, all of these research fruits are based on simple point processes, like Poisson and renewal processes.…”
Section: Superposed Point Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the point pattern literature, the term classification usually refers to the procedure of labelling individual points within a single pattern generated by a superposition of several point processes (Dasgupta and Raftery, 1998;Redenbach et al, 2015;Walsh and Raftery, 2005). This corresponds to the typical setting of spatial statistics, where a single point pattern, obtained by some physical measurement, is analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%