2008
DOI: 10.2748/tmj/1232376164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Möbius isoparametric hypersurfaces in the unit six-sphere

Abstract: An immersed umbilic-free hypersurface in the unit sphere is equipped with three Möbius invariants, namely, the Möbius metric, the Möbius second fundamental form and the Möbius form. The fundamental theorem of Möbius submanifolds geometry states that a hypersurface of dimension not less than three is uniquely determined by the Möbius metric and the Möbius second fundamental form. A Möbius isoparametric hypersurface is defined by two conditions that it has vanishing Möbius form and has constant Möbius principal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a counterpart to the Cecil-Ryan conjecture for Dupin hypersurfaces, which states that a compact embedded Dupin hypersurface in a space form is Lie equivalent to an Euclidean isoparametric hypersurface, C. P. Wang conjectured that any compact embedded Möbius isoparametric hypersurface in ‫ޓ‬ n+1 is Möbius equivalent to an Euclidean isoparametric hypersurface. Pinkall and Thorbergsson [1989] and Miyaoka and Ozawa [1989], have constructed counterexamples to the Cecil-Ryan conjecture, but we point out that the classifications of Möbius isoparametric hypersurfaces in 2005;Hu and Zhai 2008;Li et al 2002] and this paper strengthen Wang's conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a counterpart to the Cecil-Ryan conjecture for Dupin hypersurfaces, which states that a compact embedded Dupin hypersurface in a space form is Lie equivalent to an Euclidean isoparametric hypersurface, C. P. Wang conjectured that any compact embedded Möbius isoparametric hypersurface in ‫ޓ‬ n+1 is Möbius equivalent to an Euclidean isoparametric hypersurface. Pinkall and Thorbergsson [1989] and Miyaoka and Ozawa [1989], have constructed counterexamples to the Cecil-Ryan conjecture, but we point out that the classifications of Möbius isoparametric hypersurfaces in 2005;Hu and Zhai 2008;Li et al 2002] and this paper strengthen Wang's conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…By relaxing the restriction that γ = 2, local classifications for all Möbius isoparametric hypersurfaces in ‫ޓ‬ 4 , ‫ޓ‬ 5 and ‫ޓ‬ 6 were established in [Hu and Li 2005], and [Hu and Zhai 2008], respectively. It was shown that a Möbius isoparametric hypersurface in ‫ޓ‬ 4 is either of parallel Möbius second fundamental form or Möbius equivalent to the Euclidean isoparametric hypersurface in ‫ޓ‬ 4 with three distinct principal curvatures, that is, a tube of constant radius over a standard Veronese embedding of ‫ޒ‬P 2 into ‫ޓ‬ 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of these invariants is important in Möbius geometry of submanifolds, and many interesting results were obtained in recent years. Among them are various classification theorems of submanifolds with special Möbius invariants, e.g., we have the classification of all immersed hypersurfaces in S n+1 with parallel Möbius second fundamental forms [9], and that of the so-called Möbius isoparametric hypersurfaces [7,8,[10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then x is Laguerre equivalent to an open part of one of the following hypersurfaces : the oriented hypersurface x:Sk1×H6kboldR6 given by Example 3.4, or the image of τ of the oriented hypersurface x:boldR5boldR06 given by Example 3.5 , or the image of σ of a hypersurface truex̃ in R16 with mean curvature radius r=0 and ρ=constant, or the image of τ of a hypersurface truex̃ in R06 with mean curvature radius r=0 and ρ=constant. Remark From Theorem , we see that the examples of case (3) and case (4) in the Main Theorem have the same Laguerre second fundamental form boldB with the Laguerre isoparametric hypersurfaces x:MboldR6, respectively, thus they are also Laguerre isoparametric hypersurfaces. Remark From the proof of our Main Theorem, we see that the Laguerre isoparametric hypersurfaces in R6 have parallel Laguerre second fundamental form if they are not the Laguerre isotropic hypersurfaces: case (3) and case (4) in the Main Theorem. But, the Laguerre isoparametric surfaces in R3 and the Laguerre isoparametric hypersurfaces in R4 have parallel Laguerre second fundamental form (see ). Remark In Möbius geometry of hypersurfaces, we should notice that Hu, Zhai and Li, Peng classified the Möbius isoparametric hypersurfaces and the Blaschke isoparametric hypersurfaces in the unit spheres S6 completely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%