2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00680-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of moving coronary calcified plaques based on motion artifacts using convolutional neural networks: a robotic simulating study on influential factors

Abstract: Background Motion artifacts affect the images of coronary calcified plaques. This study utilized convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify the motion-contaminated images of moving coronary calcified plaques and to determine the influential factors for the classification performance. Methods Two artificial coronary arteries containing four artificial plaques of different densities were placed on a robotic arm in an anthropomorphic thorax phan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the recent rise of deep learning, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been applied in coronary motion artifact correction [23,24]. Lossau et al used CNN to evaluate the coronary motion vectors and integrated CNN into an iterative motion compensation pipeline, in which deep learning is not applied directly to correct motion artifacts in CCTA images, but to assist the conventional motion-correction methods by estimating motion vectors [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the recent rise of deep learning, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been applied in coronary motion artifact correction [23,24]. Lossau et al used CNN to evaluate the coronary motion vectors and integrated CNN into an iterative motion compensation pipeline, in which deep learning is not applied directly to correct motion artifacts in CCTA images, but to assist the conventional motion-correction methods by estimating motion vectors [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%