1996
DOI: 10.1109/36.499786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of multifrequency polarimetric SAR imagery using a dynamic learning neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One type relied on coefficients of radar backscatter [53][54][55][56][57] and the other type used decomposition maps, which are based on physical scattering mechanisms [23,27,[29][30][31]34,[46][47][48]. In this study, we compared classification results derived from PolSAR decomposition with those derived from optical satellite image data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One type relied on coefficients of radar backscatter [53][54][55][56][57] and the other type used decomposition maps, which are based on physical scattering mechanisms [23,27,[29][30][31]34,[46][47][48]. In this study, we compared classification results derived from PolSAR decomposition with those derived from optical satellite image data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the classification accuracy the backscattering values with combination of multi temporal and mutli polarization of RISAT -1 and EnviSat ASAR are used for primary level of classification. Maximum likelihood (Lee et al, 1994), Neural Network (Chen et al, 1996, Ito et al, 1998 and Support Vector Machine (Fukuda et al, 2002) The training sets (ROI) were chosen from the imagery with help of ground truth and optical imagery of Resourcesat 2 LISS IV data (09-Nov-2011) for supervised classification and applied for all the combination. The supervised classifiers namely ML, NN and SVM work carried out in Envi 4.8 image processing software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past years, various methods were employed for classification of polarimetric SAR data, based on the maximum likelihood [1], artificial neural networks [2] [3], support vector machines [4], fuzzy methods [5] or other approaches [6] [7]. In this paper we develop a semiautomatic algorithm for SAR classification using solely the amplitude data and not the complex data as the approaches above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%