2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-018-0973-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of nicotine-dependent users in India: a decision-tree approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nollen et al 11 also explored the relations between demographic, psychosocial factors, and tobacco to determine cigarette smokers at higher risk for alternative tobacco product use from a diverse sample of adult smokers. In 2019, Singh and Katyan 12 analyzed the GATS 2010 data to characterize nicotine dependency using decision tree approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nollen et al 11 also explored the relations between demographic, psychosocial factors, and tobacco to determine cigarette smokers at higher risk for alternative tobacco product use from a diverse sample of adult smokers. In 2019, Singh and Katyan 12 analyzed the GATS 2010 data to characterize nicotine dependency using decision tree approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these studies predicted a binary outcome related to smoking cessation, including the intention to quit smoking,90 adherence to nicotine replacement therapy,84 having high or low urges to smoke during a quit attempt88 and self-reported86 91 or lab-established85 cessation status. Other binary outcomes pertained to tobacco use patterns and history, including ever or current use of tobacco,81–83 87 nicotine dependence92 and whether individuals were exclusive or dual e-cigarette users 93. Only two continuous outcomes—time to first smoking lapse among recent cigarette quitters89 and biological age87—were examined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two continuous outcomes—time to first smoking lapse among recent cigarette quitters89 and biological age87—were examined. In terms of ML algorithms, decision trees (n=6)85 88 90–92 94 and tree ensembles—including random forest82 86 87 93 and boosting tree86—were the most popular. Unsupervised clustering analysis was combined with a decision tree in one instance 90.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with conventional regression, machine learning leverages computational power to reduce multicollinearity and improve the overall model performance. Applications of machine learning in tobacco research are emerging in recent years [20][21][22][23][24][25], but so far, only one such application has been on vaping behaviours. In this Holland-based study, a random forest model was used in conjunction with cross-sectional survey data to classify adult exclusive vapers from dual users of both cigarettes and e-cigarettes [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we present a simpler and more intuitive machine learning model-a classification tree-to identify and understand the importance of person-level correlates of current vaping. In other fields of tobacco research, classification trees have demonstrated good performance in predicting the status of lab-verified smoking cessation status [20], adherence to nicotine replacement therapy [23] and use of tobacco within 30-min of waking up [21]. Hence, we aimed to verify the performance of classification tree in vaping research and to provide actionable implications on policy interventions regarding e-cigarettes in a Canadian context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%