2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 2004
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2004.1327195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of non-speech acoustic signals using structure models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem can only be solved by constantly adapting the Hidden Markov Models while measuring. For details see [7].…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Sintered Gear Wheelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This problem can only be solved by constantly adapting the Hidden Markov Models while measuring. For details see [7].…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Sintered Gear Wheelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Having models to choose from, they decide for the class whose conditional probability is maximal (7) As is not known directly, we used Bayes' theorem in (7) to reduce it to the determinable conditional probability that the vector is observed given the class and the prior probability of the class itself. 7 As the probability of the feature vector does not depend on the class, it cannot change the decision and may be disregarded. The remaining term is called likelihood function.…”
Section: B Gaussian Mixture Model Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have successfully applied this method to: 1) quality assessment [7]; 2) structural health monitoring of aircraft parts [8] and train wheels [9]; 3) life cycle analysis [10]; 4) identification of individual musical instruments [11], [12]; 5) biological signal processing (auscultatory blood pressure measurement [13]); and 6) one of its original applications: automatic speech recognition (e.g., [14]- [17]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It ensures desired classification task with high classification accuracy. Figure 5 illustrates the process of extracting Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficient(MFCC) [4] features from the input audio.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K-means clustering is a method of cluster analysis which aims to partition n observation feature vectors into k clusters under the mean sequence distortion criterion. In this work, VQ models with codebook sizes K ranging 4 to 256 (4,8,16,32,64,128,256) were built. As shown in Figure 6, cluster training exemplars y in S i into K clusters with cluster centroids C i = c i j , j = 1, ..., K. In testing phase, MFCC vectors are extracted from the test audio signals.…”
Section: Figure 5 Mfcc Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%