2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification

Abstract: Although asymptomatic adults stood with stable global balance, the sagittal spinal alignment of healthy subjects, newly divided in 5 sagittal types, varied significantly. Type 3 AP appears as a new and unusual sagittal shape with low-grade PI, very low or negative PT, and hyperlordosis. Whereas most asymptomatic adults stood with C7PL behind the hip axis, a sizeable portion had C7 in front of the hip axis. This could be a new controversial aspect of ideal spinal balance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
208
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
208
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This classification has been recently updated to include a fifth type, the anteverted type 3 ( Fig. 1) [10]. Moreover, a new classification describing the evolution of the asymptomatic typology under degenerative conditions has been recently proposed by Roussouly [11] (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This classification has been recently updated to include a fifth type, the anteverted type 3 ( Fig. 1) [10]. Moreover, a new classification describing the evolution of the asymptomatic typology under degenerative conditions has been recently proposed by Roussouly [11] (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Assessment of pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), SS, and Roussouly's classification according to SS were performed [11,12].…”
Section: Analysis Of X-rays and Lumbo-pelvic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of Roussouly's classification for the sagittal morphotype did not consider in the type 3 subgroup of patient with anteverted pelvis as described in the recent classification [11], which can partly explain the variations between pre-and postoperative assessments. However our study focused on the specific analysis of the modifications of the segmental LL particularly in unbalanced patient or patients balanced with abnormal kinematics parameters, and significant variations of the distal arch of the LL mainly in the unbalanced population were observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sagittal spinal alignment and lumbar lordosis shape varies across individuals [1][2][3][4][5] . It has been a research hot spot nowadays, since Roussouly classi cation of normal spinal sagittal pro le [6][7][8] . Roussouly and colleagues established the classi cation consisting of 5 types according to pelvic incidence (PI) value 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been a research hot spot nowadays, since Roussouly classi cation of normal spinal sagittal pro le [6][7][8] . Roussouly and colleagues established the classi cation consisting of 5 types according to pelvic incidence (PI) value 8 . Lumbar lordosis (LL) morphology differs among the 5 types, including LL apex, in exion point, LL value, and lordosis distribution index (LDI), which means the proportion of distal lumbar lordosis (DLL) in global lordosis 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%