2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15145104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Photovoltaic Failures with Hidden Markov Modeling, an Unsupervised Statistical Approach

Abstract: Failure detection methods are of significant interest for photovoltaic (PV) site operators to help reduce gaps between expected and observed energy generation. Current approaches for field-based fault detection, however, rely on multiple data inputs and can suffer from interpretability issues. In contrast, this work offers an unsupervised statistical approach that leverages hidden Markov models (HMM) to identify failures occurring at PV sites. Using performance index data from 104 sites across the United State… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, research efforts have demonstrated utility of natural language processing techniques (e.g., topic modeling) and survival analyses to support evaluation of patterns in O&M records (Gunda et al, 2020). Additional statistical methods, such as Hidden Markov Modeling, have also been successfully used to support classification of failures within production data (Hopwood, Patel, et al, 2022). These and other capabilities will continue to be added to the package to improve its utility for supporting empirical analyses of field data.…”
Section: Ongoing Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, research efforts have demonstrated utility of natural language processing techniques (e.g., topic modeling) and survival analyses to support evaluation of patterns in O&M records (Gunda et al, 2020). Additional statistical methods, such as Hidden Markov Modeling, have also been successfully used to support classification of failures within production data (Hopwood, Patel, et al, 2022). These and other capabilities will continue to be added to the package to improve its utility for supporting empirical analyses of field data.…”
Section: Ongoing Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing of the difference between the measurements and model predictions, used as fault indicators, was carried out through the application of an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) monitoring chart [6]. Another statistical approach is based on labeling faults at over 100 PV sites in the United States, by the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms and hidden Markov modeling (HMM), which allow the labeling of historical behaviors without a manual setting of threshold [11]. Chine et al proposed a model for the detection of faulty modules in a string, faulty string, faulty inverter and false alarm, a group of faults which include partial shading, the ageing of PVs and inverter MPPT errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%