Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks
DOI: 10.1109/icnn.1995.487728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of plant species from CTFM ultrasonic range data using a neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have examined potted foliage of different plant species with continuous-wave frequency-modulated (CWFM) [47][48][49][50] or wideband sonar [7,51]. All these studies found class-specific differences in echo properties which demonstrated that echo classification was possible and formulated hypotheses as to how these properties relate to foliage structure.…”
Section: Classification Of Large Random Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have examined potted foliage of different plant species with continuous-wave frequency-modulated (CWFM) [47][48][49][50] or wideband sonar [7,51]. All these studies found class-specific differences in echo properties which demonstrated that echo classification was possible and formulated hypotheses as to how these properties relate to foliage structure.…”
Section: Classification Of Large Random Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These particular sonar sounds are well suited to convey detailed shape information that can be used for target recognition. Most work using CTFM sonar has concentrated on a biological approach, using neural networks for identification (Harper and McKerrow 1995;Gorman and Sejnowski 1988). However, the sensors essentially return the same information as the sampled time of flight sensors, although in our experience the data are less prone to noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In that case, the previous equation takes the more general form: The modulation rate of the transmitted signal determines the frequency range of the beat signal, here chosen to be in the audible range. Following Dror, Zagaski, and Moss (1995) and Harper and McKerrow (1995), we have called the amplitude spectrum of the beat signal the CTFM sonar signature, since it corresponds to a one-dimensional range map in the direction of the sonar. In Kao and Probert (2000), it is referred to as the sonar image.…”
Section: Operation Of Frequency Modulation Sonarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, this technology has not been introduced into robotics and related technologies, but Kao and Probert (2000) showed that it is efficient for recognizing geometric features for localization. A number of workers have attempted to use similar sensors for classification using neural networks (Dror, Zagaski, and Moss 1995;Harper and McKerrow 1995;Dror et al 1996), using as input various formats of echo representation (time domain, frequency domain, and time frequency). In contrast, the classifier we describe in this paper uses statistical features of the echo signal, in particular the distribution of energy with time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%