1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1982.tb01826.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Plants Resistant to Heterodera avenae1

Abstract: Differentiation of barley plants resistant to Heterodera avenae is simple when they are completely without cysts and the number of cysts is high on a susceptible control cultivar. Problems with classification are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the resistance-associated T-A-A-G haplotype that is present in Chebec was also observed for its resistant ancestor Orge Martin. This haplotype was also observed for Bajo Aragon, Barley 191, Morocco, Martin 403-2, Orge Martin 839, Sabarlis and Siri, all of which have been classified as carrying Rha2 and/or Rha3 (Andersen and Andersen 1982 ; Smiley et al 2011 ). Four other haplotypes were observed: two in accessions that were found to be resistant (C-G-G-G in Morocco (Early) and Athinais, and C-A-A-G in Nile) and two (C-G-G-A and C-G-G-null) among cultivars that were found to be susceptible (Alfa, Clipper, Drost, Herta, Ortolan, Varde and Schooner).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the resistance-associated T-A-A-G haplotype that is present in Chebec was also observed for its resistant ancestor Orge Martin. This haplotype was also observed for Bajo Aragon, Barley 191, Morocco, Martin 403-2, Orge Martin 839, Sabarlis and Siri, all of which have been classified as carrying Rha2 and/or Rha3 (Andersen and Andersen 1982 ; Smiley et al 2011 ). Four other haplotypes were observed: two in accessions that were found to be resistant (C-G-G-G in Morocco (Early) and Athinais, and C-A-A-G in Nile) and two (C-G-G-A and C-G-G-null) among cultivars that were found to be susceptible (Alfa, Clipper, Drost, Herta, Ortolan, Varde and Schooner).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The plant materials used here included two populations of doubled haploid lines (Chebec/Harrington (C/H) and Clipper/Sahara 3771 (C/S)), their parents (Chebec, Harrington, Clipper and Sahara 3771), the susceptible cultivar Schooner, accessions of 17 barley lines that had previously been used to discriminate among pathotypes of H. avenae (Table S1 in Online Resource 1) (Andersen and Andersen 1982; Kort et al 1964; O’Brien and Fisher 1977, 1979; Smiley et al 2011) and 175 other cultivars of barley (Table S2 in Online Resource 1). The C/H and C/S populations were the same as those used by Kretschmer et al (1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 20 white females were produced on susceptible cultivars in six of the nine tests reported. Whilst experiments in which fewer than 20 white females per plant were produced are considered less reliable for accurately distinguishing resistant and susceptible phenotypes (Andersen & Andersen, 1982b), experiments with fewer white females on susceptible cultivars have been reported (Cotton, 1967;Lücke, 1976;O'Brien & Fisher, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tahıl kist nematodlarının mücadelesinde en etkili yöntemlerden biri dayanıklı çeşitlerin kullanımıdır. Mümkünse dayanıklı olduğu belirlenen çeşitler tercih edilmelidir (Andersen, 1982;Williams ve ark., 2002). Konukçu bitkilerin mevcut olmaması durumunda nematodun yoğunluğu azalacağından ekim nöbeti bir diğer önemli mücadele yöntemidir.…”
Section: Mücadelesiunclassified