2020
DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2020.1853948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of polarimetric SAR images using compact convolutional neural networks

Abstract: Classification of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images is an active research area with a major role in environmental applications. The traditional Machine Learning (ML) methods proposed in this domain generally focus on utilizing highly discriminative features to improve the classification performance, but this task is complicated by the well-known "curse of dimensionality" phenomena. Other approaches based on deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have certain limitations and drawbacks, su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training sample rate in the comparison experiments is also set as 1%. Four methods are selected for comparison: the multichannel fusion convolutional neural network based on scattering mechanism (MCCNN) [52], the compact and adaptive implementation of CNNs using a sliding-window classification approach [57], the composite kernel and Hybrid discriminative random field model based on feature fusion (CK-HDRF) [58], and the recurrent complex-valued convolutional neural network (RCV-CNN) [13]. In which, CK-HDRF belongs to machine learning, RCV-CNN belongs to semi-supervised learning.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training sample rate in the comparison experiments is also set as 1%. Four methods are selected for comparison: the multichannel fusion convolutional neural network based on scattering mechanism (MCCNN) [52], the compact and adaptive implementation of CNNs using a sliding-window classification approach [57], the composite kernel and Hybrid discriminative random field model based on feature fusion (CK-HDRF) [58], and the recurrent complex-valued convolutional neural network (RCV-CNN) [13]. In which, CK-HDRF belongs to machine learning, RCV-CNN belongs to semi-supervised learning.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These CNN-based models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various classification tasks and have been extended and enhanced for PolSAR image classification 9 , 10 . Several papers and research studies have addressed similar issues and have contributed to the field, for example, semi-supervised complex-valued generative adversarial networks, 11 classification of polarimetric SAR images using compact CNNs, 12 and semi-supervised classification of PolSAR images based on co-training of CNN and SVM 13 . These advancements in research are driving progress in PolSAR image classification and opening up new avenues for more accurate and practical remote sensing applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to ML, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are capable of analyzing the information of adjacent pixels and better extracting image features. This has resulted in better results in image classification researches [19,20], and convolutional neural networks such as fully convolutional networks (FCNs), e.g., DeepLab V3+, are consequently becoming increasingly popular in LULC and vegetation classification [21,22]. FCNs have replaced the last layer in CNNs with a deconvolution [23], which has retained the advantages of CNNs and enhanced the accuracy of image semantic segmentation independent of the input image size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%