2015
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of potato cultivars to establish their processing aptitude

Abstract: 11 BACKGROUND:The commercial potato cultivars are diverse, not only in their physical 12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(81 reference statements)
3
35
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The average weight of the potato tubers ranged from 175.09 to 337.60 g. The physical characteristics of cultivars were described in a previous research work (Yang, Achaerandio, & Pujolà, 2015).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average weight of the potato tubers ranged from 175.09 to 337.60 g. The physical characteristics of cultivars were described in a previous research work (Yang, Achaerandio, & Pujolà, 2015).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the highest percentages of tubers were found in class II, and total absence of tubers in class I. Regarding tuber classification, the cultivar Ágata does not produce large tubers of class I (Yang et al, 2015), with diameters above 85 mm, this cultivar produces predominantly tubers class II (Jadoski et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Firmness was measured using the texture analyzer (TA.XT Plus, Stable Micro Systems Co. Ltd., UK) equipped with a 30-kg load cell and connected with a WarnerBratzler blade set with a speed of 1 mm s −1 . Twenty potato strips of each treatment and day were analyzed (Yang et al 2016). Firmness was measured as the maximum shear strength values and expressed as maximum force (N).…”
Section: Physicochemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%