2013
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2012.2217475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of $q$-Ary Perfect Quantum Codes

Abstract: We solve the problem of the classification of perfect quantum codes. We prove that the only nontrivial perfect quantum codes are those with the parameters ( ( 2 2 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate this, we note that there is a significant amount of modern articles which aim to generalise the results in Table 1 to extended codes or to different metrics, but they always treat the case when q is a prime power. For example, under this assumption, Li and Xing [12] classified perfect quantum codes and Gubitosi, Portela, and Qureshi [13] showed analogous results for the Niederreiter-Rosenbloom-Tsfasman metric.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To illustrate this, we note that there is a significant amount of modern articles which aim to generalise the results in Table 1 to extended codes or to different metrics, but they always treat the case when q is a prime power. For example, under this assumption, Li and Xing [12] classified perfect quantum codes and Gubitosi, Portela, and Qureshi [13] showed analogous results for the Niederreiter-Rosenbloom-Tsfasman metric.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…All perfect codes over prime power alphabets are either Hamming codes or have parameters (n, M, e, q) = (11, 3 6 , 2, 3), (23, 2 12 , 3, 2).…”
Section: Prime Power ≥1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can assert that this framework is a very useful and potential tool in studying the problems about quantum error-correcting codes. In fact, the idea of this framework has been used to solve the problem about the classification of perfect quantum codes [20]. Recently, we realized that this tool might have potential application in finding out various bounds on the parameters of the most general quantum error-correcting codes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%