2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of savanna tree species, in the Greater Kruger National Park region, by integrating hyperspectral and LiDAR data in a Random Forest data mining environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
191
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
191
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Metrics of the same family that had a high correlation (r > 0.90) were discarded, keeping at least one per family. Given the usefulness of the Gini index as a variable selection and interpretation criterion demonstrated in many studies [8,54,55], our choice of the highly correlated variables to be discarded was based on this index. The crowns were equally separated into a training subset and a validation subset.…”
Section: Lidar Point and Ppc Height Correspondence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metrics of the same family that had a high correlation (r > 0.90) were discarded, keeping at least one per family. Given the usefulness of the Gini index as a variable selection and interpretation criterion demonstrated in many studies [8,54,55], our choice of the highly correlated variables to be discarded was based on this index. The crowns were equally separated into a training subset and a validation subset.…”
Section: Lidar Point and Ppc Height Correspondence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, choosing a classification system that comprehensively captures vegetation community composition and structure is still a major challenge for vegetation mapping from remotely sensed data (Rapp et al 2005). Traditionally, the number of vegetation units and/or the properties of vegetation units within a forest have been predefined by the prior knowledge of experts from previous experience or field sampling data (Bork and Su 2007;Carpenter et al 1999;Naidoo et al 2012). However, this could lead to biased or inconsistent classification systems across regions and might not result in optimal breaks among different vegetation communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cho et al (2012), Colgan et al (2012) and Naidoo et al (2012) mapped tree species compositions in African savannas through the combination of LiDAR data and hyperspectral data using maximum likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine classifiers, respectively; Dalponte et al (2012) and Hill and Thomson (2005) classified tree species compositions of broadleaf and coniferous mixed forests through the fusion of spectral and LiDAR data; Holmgren et al (2008) and Koukoulas and Blackburn (2005) used a maximum likelihood classifier to identify individual tree species from LiDAR-derived structure parameters and multispectral information in deciduous and coniferous forests, respectively. It has been reported that the integration of LiDAR data and optical imagery can increase the vegetation composition classification accuracy by 16%-20% in rangelands, compared to using only LiDAR data or optical imagery (Bork and Su 2007 structure characteristics, which can be estimated by statistical imputation methods that incorporate field measurements with LiDAR data and optical imagery (Falkowski et al 2010;Hummel at al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this research did not allow us to confirm the spectral variation hypothesis on a local scale, even though Oldeland et al [56] suggested that the use of hyperspectral information should improve monitoring of species diversity. In this light, recent studies [43,44] have proven that the hyperspectral information from airborne sensors can significantly enhance the predictive power of models not only because of the spectral information but also because of the improvement provided by the spatial resolution [24,26,41,58,59]. Another relevant source of information could be an analysis of seasonal and annual variability that can provide an additional element in estimating biodiversity [24], particularly in deciduous forests like Monte Oscuro.…”
Section: Ecological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stage occupied the Random Forest (RF) package [107] in regression mode as an exploratory analysis to give priority to and select the relevant variables in the prediction of richness. We used RF because of its improvements over other tree classification techniques [59]. Its ability to construct hundreds of decision tree models using random subsets of the variables, in addition to its internal cross-validation and bootstrap aggregation (bagging) [108], make it a powerful tool for variable selection.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Spatializationmentioning
confidence: 99%