2002
DOI: 10.1006/jssc.2001.9378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Simple Oxides: A Polarizability Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
164
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
164
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The refraction index of samples A and B differ by %5% which is about the ratio between the polarizabilities of the samples considering the relative amount of Bi 2 O 3 and GeO 2 , in agreement with Ref. 25. We also notice that the linear absorption coefficient of sample B is smaller than the absorption coefficient of sample A, in accordance with Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The refraction index of samples A and B differ by %5% which is about the ratio between the polarizabilities of the samples considering the relative amount of Bi 2 O 3 and GeO 2 , in agreement with Ref. 25. We also notice that the linear absorption coefficient of sample B is smaller than the absorption coefficient of sample A, in accordance with Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, they found several different correlations between OB and average EN of the glasses depending on the composition. The separation of validity ranges for their linear fit equations seems somewhat arbitrary, but to an extent corresponds to the three groupings of oxides (I, II, and III) as described by Dimitrov and Komatsu (2002) which takes into account various factors as summarized in Table B.5. In any case, the three relations give values that bin the OB of the glass into three ranges.…”
Section: B10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density values show that the glass becomes more rigid and compact as niobium is introduced in the composition. This may be due to the fact that ionic radii of cations are in the order Bi 3+ > Nb 5+ > Ge 4+ [10]. Also the polarizing strength of niobium ion is less than that of bismuth ion but greater than Ge 4+ [10,11].…”
Section: Density and Molar Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the fact that ionic radii of cations are in the order Bi 3+ > Nb 5+ > Ge 4+ [10]. Also the polarizing strength of niobium ion is less than that of bismuth ion but greater than Ge 4+ [10,11]. These factors may result in change in coordination polyhedra of the network.…”
Section: Density and Molar Volumementioning
confidence: 99%