2016 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/mlsp.2016.7738852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of structural brain networks based on information divergence of graph spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible explanation is in much higher dimensionality combined with greater noise in the data. The latter statement is partially supported by the fact that typical quality of classification for both datasets [21,9] is much lower than for ADNI2 database considered in this work.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The possible explanation is in much higher dimensionality combined with greater noise in the data. The latter statement is partially supported by the fact that typical quality of classification for both datasets [21,9] is much lower than for ADNI2 database considered in this work.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The problem of brain network classification has been paid much attention recently [17,9,21,19,18]. This problem is non-trivial as most modern classification algorithms can work only with vectorial data while in our case each object in the dataset is represented by graph.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, based on a large body of research and predictable dimensionality reduction [34], [35], it is common to use for classification of functional connectivity matrices [36]- [38] representing correlations in time-series between pre-defined regions derived from blood oxygenation leveldependent (BOLD) sensitive fMRI. Likewise, to classify diffusion weighted images (DWI) it is common to use structural connectivity matrices representing the number of white matter tracts traversing the brain between specific regions [39]- [41].…”
Section: A Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kernel improved the classification accuracy of SVM to 71% on a public dataset. This work had been done in 2016 [8].Petrov D et all in 2016, a data pre-processing method that utilized geometric and topological connectome normalization was put forth. The work had a claim that an improvement had been done in SVM classification of ASD and TD [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%