2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of sub-populations for quantitative risk assessment based on awareness and perception: A cross-sectional population study of private well users in Ontario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chi-square tests were used to assess bivariate proportional associations between categorical variables, followed by post-hoc testing via standardised residuals. Additionally, dummy variables, odds ratio (OR) estimates, and post-hoc testing using adjusted standardised residuals above and below the threshold of 1.50 were used to determine the presence and magnitude of associations between categorical (dichotomous/nominal) variables [ 45 ]. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to investigate relationships between continuous and categorical variables, followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons, while Spearman’s Rho was used to assess nonparametric associations between continuous variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chi-square tests were used to assess bivariate proportional associations between categorical variables, followed by post-hoc testing via standardised residuals. Additionally, dummy variables, odds ratio (OR) estimates, and post-hoc testing using adjusted standardised residuals above and below the threshold of 1.50 were used to determine the presence and magnitude of associations between categorical (dichotomous/nominal) variables [ 45 ]. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to investigate relationships between continuous and categorical variables, followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons, while Spearman’s Rho was used to assess nonparametric associations between continuous variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%