2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2016.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of the Major Copper Sulphides into semiconductor types, and associated flotation characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the secondary copper sulphides, bornite has the highest recoveries in the sulphide circuit with similar behaviour to chalcopyrite, whereas chalcocite has the highest recoveries in the mixed and oxide circuits. This is consistent with observations in the literature that the Eh ranges for optimal flotation of chalcopyrite and chalcocite differ due to the difference in semiconductor types, with chalcocite floating better at more negative Eh (Lotter, Bradshaw, and Barnes, 2016). Additional CPS stages are likely responsible for higher recoveries of chalcocite, native copper, and copper oxides and carbonates in the mixed circuit (Pacquot and Ngulube, 2015), and this reasoning has motivated CPS projects for the oxide and sulphide circuit to further improve flotation recoveries.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the secondary copper sulphides, bornite has the highest recoveries in the sulphide circuit with similar behaviour to chalcopyrite, whereas chalcocite has the highest recoveries in the mixed and oxide circuits. This is consistent with observations in the literature that the Eh ranges for optimal flotation of chalcopyrite and chalcocite differ due to the difference in semiconductor types, with chalcocite floating better at more negative Eh (Lotter, Bradshaw, and Barnes, 2016). Additional CPS stages are likely responsible for higher recoveries of chalcocite, native copper, and copper oxides and carbonates in the mixed circuit (Pacquot and Ngulube, 2015), and this reasoning has motivated CPS projects for the oxide and sulphide circuit to further improve flotation recoveries.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Key factors identified that could influence the chalcopyrite grain surfaces include the stream's bulk mineralogy (affecting iron and copper species in solution), the grinding environment (different quality steel media used), and the pulp potential (modified by addition of NaHS) (Heyes and Trahar, 1979;Bruckard, Sparrow, and Woodcock, 2011;Chen, Peng, and Bradshaw, 2014;Greet et al, 2004;Whiteman. Lotter, and Amos, 2016;Lotter, Bradshaw, and Barnes, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of gangue sulphide minerals such as pyrite and non-sulphide minerals reduce the quality of concentrates [10]. It is the only naturally floatable copper mineral, for other sulphide copper minerals thiol collectors are added to create the hydrophobic surface needed for flotation [11]. Chalcopyrite floats well with moderate amounts of xanthate collectors over a wide pH range [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed reviews on the formulation and application of these mixed collector systems have been published by Lotter and Bradshaw (2010) and Lotter et al (2016) and those authors discuss some of the drivers behind the synergistic effects often observed.…”
Section: Flotation Additives (Reagents)mentioning
confidence: 99%