2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.101.062327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of the MNIST data set with quantum slow feature analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparable results are different such that making comparisons does not necessarily make complete sense, however for the sake of completeness and a gauge of the quality of our system we include comparisons with other systems with descriptions on how they differ. One paper discusses using kNN and PCA to classify MNIST, and with comparable PCA dimensions attains an accuracy of around 35% [32]. Comparing our systems performance to Tensorflow Quantum (TF-Q), we are able to attain 12.51% better results when distinguishing 0's and 1's, and 11.7% better results when distinguishing between numbers 3 and 8.…”
Section: Binary Classification Of the Mnist Datasetmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The comparable results are different such that making comparisons does not necessarily make complete sense, however for the sake of completeness and a gauge of the quality of our system we include comparisons with other systems with descriptions on how they differ. One paper discusses using kNN and PCA to classify MNIST, and with comparable PCA dimensions attains an accuracy of around 35% [32]. Comparing our systems performance to Tensorflow Quantum (TF-Q), we are able to attain 12.51% better results when distinguishing 0's and 1's, and 11.7% better results when distinguishing between numbers 3 and 8.…”
Section: Binary Classification Of the Mnist Datasetmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…SVMs could still be used to calculate prediction probabilities for such a multi-class classification problem [31]. Since the task of classification itself is still an active area of research with connections to many other scientific fields (such as quantum mechanics [26] with promising results [2,13]), it can be expected that the quality and performance of classification methods is subject to future improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum Machine Learning techniques are currently impaired by NISQ devices limitations [24]. Thus, many proposed QML applications rely on using wellknown datasets, where pre-processing techniques are standard [16,25,26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%