2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00197-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of treatment-related mortality in children with cancer: a systematic assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our cumulative incidences of death in CR1 are similar to those reported by other study groups in overlapping time periods . However, comparing TRM rates is cumbersome due to the lack of uniformly used definitions . Because we defined TRM as death in CR1, patients who died in early stages of the treatment as a result of toxicity, but before achieving CR “by definition”, are not included in this number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our cumulative incidences of death in CR1 are similar to those reported by other study groups in overlapping time periods . However, comparing TRM rates is cumbersome due to the lack of uniformly used definitions . Because we defined TRM as death in CR1, patients who died in early stages of the treatment as a result of toxicity, but before achieving CR “by definition”, are not included in this number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because we defined TRM as death in CR1, patients who died in early stages of the treatment as a result of toxicity, but before achieving CR “by definition”, are not included in this number. Subsequently, this might be an underestimation compared with other reported TRM rates that include patients with just absence of progressive disease at time of death . A very recent study reported that TRM, defined as death in the absence of progressive disease, accounts for more than half of all deaths in Dutch pediatric patients with hematological malignancies …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because administrative data do not permit the capture of all of the complexity of palliative care, our indicators of HI‐EOL and MI‐EOL care may not be relevant for all individual situations. In our study, we were unable to identify and exclude patients who died of treatment‐related mortality (ie , “the absence of progressive disease at the time of death” according to Alexander et al). Thus, some deaths were unplanned, and active therapy was warranted until the time of death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ED was defined as death during Ind I. EFS and OS were measured from study entry, and disease-free survival (DFS), TRM, 22 and RR were measured from the end of Ind I, for patients in CR. Patients lost to follow-up were censored at their last known contact.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%