2007 9th International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications 2007
DOI: 10.1109/isspa.2007.4555521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of underwater transient signals using MFCC feature vector

Abstract: This paper presents a new method for classification of underwater transient signals, which employs frame-based decision with Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC). The MFCC feature vector is extracted frameby-frame basis for an input signal that is detected as a transient signal, and Euclidean distances are calculated between this and all MFCC feature vectors in the reference database. Then each frame of the detected input signal is mapped to the class having minimum Euclidean distance in the reference da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al [14] Since the 1990s, researchers have been integrating signal analysis theory with machine learning techniques, utilizing handcrafted feature identifiers to extract attributes from underwater acoustic signals. These attributes include the Zero-crossing Rate (ZCR), Wavelet Transform (WT) [8], Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT), Higher-order Spectral Estimation, and Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) [9]. Machine learning classifiers such as Bayesian, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [10] are then employed to identify and classify underwater targets.…”
Section: Methods Based On Traditional Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [14] Since the 1990s, researchers have been integrating signal analysis theory with machine learning techniques, utilizing handcrafted feature identifiers to extract attributes from underwater acoustic signals. These attributes include the Zero-crossing Rate (ZCR), Wavelet Transform (WT) [8], Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT), Higher-order Spectral Estimation, and Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) [9]. Machine learning classifiers such as Bayesian, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [10] are then employed to identify and classify underwater targets.…”
Section: Methods Based On Traditional Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perform DCT on the M logarithm energies calculated by Formula (4) to obtain the MFCC of order L (L = 12-16), where the DCT is [20]: In practical application, the cepstrum difference parameter (delta cepstrum) is calculated following the value of L MFCC cepstrum coefficients, which is expressed as [18]:…”
Section: Mfccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional algorithm, such as GMM [ 13 ] and SVM [ 14 ], were used for the underwater acoustic field. These manually extracted features and algorithms have played a significant role in the underwater acoustic field, for example, MFCC features were extracted in a lot of work [ 15 , 16 , 17 ] for UATR. Xin et al note in the classification of ship-radiated noise signals that the traditional classifier has many limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%