2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification, strength and water retention characteristics of lateritic regolith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do so, we used independent, field-based measurements to quantify the strength of the parent material underlying the mobile soil layer. Jones and Graham, 1993;Johnson-Maynard et al, 1994;Schoeneberger et al, 1995;Jiao et al, 2005;Kew and Gilkes, 2006). Quantifying strength can be done in a number of ways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we used independent, field-based measurements to quantify the strength of the parent material underlying the mobile soil layer. Jones and Graham, 1993;Johnson-Maynard et al, 1994;Schoeneberger et al, 1995;Jiao et al, 2005;Kew and Gilkes, 2006). Quantifying strength can be done in a number of ways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition of regolith materials left after bauxite mining in the Darling Range of Western Australia is possible using a field key developed by Kew and Gilkes (2006). Distinct zones of morphological properties (texture, pedality, colour, coarse fragment content) can be described using the key.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A field key to the regolith materials left after bauxite mining in the Darling Range of south Western Australia was developed by Kew and Gilkes (2006). The key uses field morphological properties (texture, pedality, colour, coarse fragment content) to map the spatially diverse materials that strongly affect plant growth and the success of mine pit rehabilitation (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Bauxite Mine Floor Regolithmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second subclass number indicates increasing coarse fragment content from 0 to 50% (1), 50 to 80% (2), and greater than 80% (3). Some class and subclass categories dominate and several may be present at any given location (adapted from Kew and Gilkes 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%