2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification system of graft tears following superior capsule reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, graft tears have been reported [ 17 , 18 ]. Mirzayan et al [ 7 ] have classified graft tear patterns into three categories: 1. Intact graft 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, graft tears have been reported [ 17 , 18 ]. Mirzayan et al [ 7 ] have classified graft tear patterns into three categories: 1. Intact graft 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the overall outcomes of SCR have been positive, graft tears have been reported [ 6 ]. Mirzayan et al [ 7 ] classified graft tear patterns following SCR with dermal allograft into three types: 1. Intact graft, 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study on graft classifications was conducted on patients in whom SCR was performed using alloderm. 30 In that report, the authors also used 5 categories to stratify the graft condition according to the presence and location of the tear as follows: intact, tear from the glenoid, midsubstance tear, tear from the tuberosity, and absent graft. However, there was no further description of the graft state in that study, which limited its capacity to explain and understand the changes that occurred due to autograft remodeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%