2017 Computing Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sai.2017.8252104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification techniques for automatic speech recognition (ASR) algorithms used with real time speech translation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several classification methods have been employed for ASR, with some still in use, some evolving, and new methods emerging. Deep Neural Networks (DNN) and Hidden Markov Models (HMM) are considered the most effective algorithms and classification methods in learning vocal signals [6], [7]. The choice of learning methods (HMM, GMM, DTW, SVM, DNN, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several classification methods have been employed for ASR, with some still in use, some evolving, and new methods emerging. Deep Neural Networks (DNN) and Hidden Markov Models (HMM) are considered the most effective algorithms and classification methods in learning vocal signals [6], [7]. The choice of learning methods (HMM, GMM, DTW, SVM, DNN, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of learning methods (HMM, GMM, DTW, SVM, DNN, etc.) [7] [8] depend on the analysis parameters, data size, and generalization capacity. In essence, one must consider testing and generalization methods to validate the learning model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean classification accuracy is 95.70 % when using a combination model of Phoneme with a fusion of MFCC and proposed features as a features vector. Nasereddin et al [8] proposed research for classifying speech signals into 4 classes using HMM, Dynamic time warping (DTW) and Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) with MFCC feature extraction. DBN outperformed in recognizing one class while HMM is achieving higher recognition rate for the other classes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emergence of the fifth-generation mobile communication system (5G), many computing-intensive services have been developed, such as face recognition [1], self-driving cars [2], and real-time translation [3]. However, the existing civil devices cannot provide sufficient computing resources for these computing-intensive tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%