2019
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/256/1/012043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification Tree Analysis (Gini-Index) Smoke Detection using Himawari_8 Satellite Data Over Sumatera-Borneo Maritime Continent Sout East Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the threshold values and the features are hard to define, as they are strongly associated with the local conditions and solar zenith angles at the time of the image acquisition and vary greatly across different sensor platforms [9,10]. To further detect fire smoke pixels automatically, machine learning techniques, including traditional non-neural network techniques [13,17,18] and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural networks [7,9], were employed using training samples extracted from visually classified polygons or by multithresholds approaches. Such approaches may have undermined the generalisability due to having few deep semantic features.…”
Section: Approaches Used In Satellite-based Fire Smoke Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the threshold values and the features are hard to define, as they are strongly associated with the local conditions and solar zenith angles at the time of the image acquisition and vary greatly across different sensor platforms [9,10]. To further detect fire smoke pixels automatically, machine learning techniques, including traditional non-neural network techniques [13,17,18] and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural networks [7,9], were employed using training samples extracted from visually classified polygons or by multithresholds approaches. Such approaches may have undermined the generalisability due to having few deep semantic features.…”
Section: Approaches Used In Satellite-based Fire Smoke Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the variants of fire smoke in different scenarios captured by Landsat 8 OLI, visualised in true colour using bands 4 (red), 3 (green), and 2 (blue). Early research tried to discriminate fire smoke in the satellite imagery from other confounding objects (e.g., water, snow, cloud) based on shallow handcrafted features at the pixel level [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Such features have strong associations with various local conditions and need to be properly redefined in a different area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite cloud images are of the Earth's cloud cover and landmark features as seen from top to bottom by meteorological satellites. One of the satellites was Himawari8, which has a visual light field of view of 0.5-1 m, a time resolution of 10 min and a spatial resolution of 500 m. The Himawari8 satellite doubles the imaging resolution and shortens the time required for global observations, which allows for capturing real-time images and accurately identifying typhoon intensity [25,26].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Artificial intelligence methods. The early use of traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Random Forests [29], neural networks [30], and Support Vector Machines [31], and the recent successful application of deep learning in the smoke area recognition based on video images has attracted widespread attention from scholars worldwide [12,[32][33][34][35][36]. They have tried to conduct research related to satellite image smoke area recognition based on deep learning algorithms, but it is still under exploration and development because of poor interpretability and the need for a large number of training samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%