2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifications in Brief: The Pipkin Classification of Femoral Head Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Femoral neck fractures combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head are very rare [ 17 , 18 , 32 ]. It is usually caused by a high-energy injury [ 33 ], most often seen in traffic accidents among young adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral neck fractures combined with anterior dislocation of the femoral head are very rare [ 17 , 18 , 32 ]. It is usually caused by a high-energy injury [ 33 ], most often seen in traffic accidents among young adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate a better outcome with Pipkin type I and type II fractures when compared to Pipkin III and IV fractures, providing a crude validity to the classification system. 25 However, no studies have reported on the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability, which is most likely due to the infrequency of these injuries, with data only limited to small case series. Some authors regard the Brumback classification as more accurate and clinically valid, when compared to the Pipkin classification.…”
Section: Classification Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 ] According to the classification system, Pipkin type III injuries constitute a subgroup of femoral head fractures associated with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures (FNFs). [ 4 ] As the least common 1, Pipkin Type-III injuries contributed to 8.6% of all the Pipkin fractures. Restricted by the complexity of the reconstruction of the natural hip joint, Pipkin type III fractures presented a worse prognosis than Pipkin type I or II fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%