2014
DOI: 10.14569/ijarai.2014.030702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifications of Motor Imagery Tasks in Brain Computer Interface Using Linear Discriminant Analysis

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we address a method for motor imagery feature extraction for brain computer interface (BCI). The wavelet coefficients were used to extract the features from the motor imagery EEG and the linear discriminant analysis was utilized to classify the pattern of left or right hand imagery movement and rest. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated using EEG data recorded by us, with 8 g.tec active electrodes by means of g.MOBIlab+ module. The maximum accuracy of classification is 9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bashashati et al [22] performed a comparative study using 14 different BCI configurations finding that the logistic regression algorithm and multi‐layer perceptron classifiers were among the best in all different designs. These results go against to findings in publications in the MI‐based BCI field, where the most recommended and utilised classifiers are ldc [23] or SVM algorithms [20]. The main difference between the above‐mentioned work and the present study is that these results are based on the existence of task‐ specific synchrostates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Bashashati et al [22] performed a comparative study using 14 different BCI configurations finding that the logistic regression algorithm and multi‐layer perceptron classifiers were among the best in all different designs. These results go against to findings in publications in the MI‐based BCI field, where the most recommended and utilised classifiers are ldc [23] or SVM algorithms [20]. The main difference between the above‐mentioned work and the present study is that these results are based on the existence of task‐ specific synchrostates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Then we present a feasibility study of a real-time application that provides MI control of a computer game with VR feedback on each successfully imagined and virtually executed movement of hands or feet. The main contributions of this paper include: (1) superior classification accuracy (offline tests) compared to previous works, (2) demonstrates the feasibility, and (3) very good user acceptance of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In case of binary problems, a band power or power spectrum is also an adequate approach [21,38]. The most preferred classification is the supervised machine learning such as the support vector machine (SVM) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [2,44]. In case of binary problems, a simple specified threshold could be an efficient choice [21,38,43].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Classical Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is an attempt to overcome such drawbacks using EEG-based BCI technology. BCI is an interesting field of research and applications [1] that can help in creating a new way of communication for persons with severe disabilities [2]. The field of BCI has witnessed a great interest especially concerning robotic devices control, with particular focus on health applications, where the utilization of BCI to control prosthesis devices is increasing the quality of life for the patients suffering from diseases causing permanent/temporary paralysis or suffering from the loss of the limb [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%