2015
DOI: 10.1515/fcds-2015-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifier Ensembles Using Structural Features For Spammer Detection In Online Social Networks

Abstract: Abstract.As the online social network technology is gaining all time high popularity and usage, the malicious behavior and attacks of spammers are getting smarter and difficult to track. The newer spamming approaches using the social engineering concepts are making traditional spam and spammer detection techniques obsolete. Especially, content-based filtering of spam messages and spammer profiles in online social networks is becoming difficult. Newer approaches for spammer detection using topological features … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fictitious reviews were more exaggerated than authentic ones—a finding consistent with prior studies (DePaulo et al, ; Yoo & Gretzel, ). Even though spammers are growing smarter (Abulaish & Bhat, ), they are not adept enough to blur the lines between authentic and fictitious reviews based on exaggeration. Based on negligence, fictitious reviews were richer in first‐person singular words than authentic entries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fictitious reviews were more exaggerated than authentic ones—a finding consistent with prior studies (DePaulo et al, ; Yoo & Gretzel, ). Even though spammers are growing smarter (Abulaish & Bhat, ), they are not adept enough to blur the lines between authentic and fictitious reviews based on exaggeration. Based on negligence, fictitious reviews were richer in first‐person singular words than authentic entries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authentic reviews are generally expected to be less exaggerated than fictitious ones (Maurer & Schaich, 2011). However, recent literature finds evidence of spammers becoming smarter to blur the lines between authentic and fictitious entries (Abulaish & Bhat, 2015). To deliberately mimic authentic entries, fictitious reviews might not be overly exaggerated.…”
Section: Exaggerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of these tweets share their opinions on real life events and discuss different issues of the society. Recently, a large number of literatures have proposed methods to analyze social network data, especially the Twitter data, for various purposes [2,3,4,5,6,7]. In [8], the authors used the predictive power of social media data to identify the conflicting in US election 2010 using sentiment analysis methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since graph is a popular data structure to model structural as well as contextual relationships of data objects, recently graph data clustering is considered as one of the interesting and challenging research problems [16,22], and it aims to decompose a large graph into di erent densely connected components. Some of the applications of the graph clustering is community detection in online social networks [5,7,8], social bot detection [10,11], spammer detection [1,3,6,9], functional relation identi cation in large protein-protein interaction networks, and so on. Generally graph clustering methods are based on the concept of normalized cut, structural density, or modularity [16,22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an one dimensional vector. In case, there is no direct edge between a pair of vertices (e.g., 1 and 3 ), the corresponding edge vector is a zero vector. If we simply calculate the Euclidean distance between the vertex-pairs, then the distance between the vertex-pairs ( 1 , 2 ), ( 2 , 3 ), ( 3 , 4 ) and ( 4 , 1 ) is same (10 unit), whereas the distance calculated by the proposed MAGDist di ers, based on the weight of the edges between them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%