2019
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01632-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying individual differences in interoception: Implications for the measurement of interoceptive awareness

Abstract: It has been suggested that individual differences in interoception (the perception of the body’s internal state) can be divided into three distinct dimensions: interoceptive accuracy (performance on objective tests of interoceptive accuracy), interoceptive sensibility (self-reported beliefs concerning one’s own interoception) and interoceptive awareness (a metacognitive measure indexed by the correspondence between interoceptive accuracy and interoceptive sensibility). Research conducted under this model under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
154
2
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
18
154
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Metacognitive insight into performance was operationalized as the correspondence between interoceptive accuracy (heartbeat tracking task) and interoceptive sensibility [BPQ and confidence ratings (7,49)]. In the present study this was measured as group correlations between heartbeat tracking scores, and BPQ and confidence ratings.…”
Section: Metacognitive Insightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metacognitive insight into performance was operationalized as the correspondence between interoceptive accuracy (heartbeat tracking task) and interoceptive sensibility [BPQ and confidence ratings (7,49)]. In the present study this was measured as group correlations between heartbeat tracking scores, and BPQ and confidence ratings.…”
Section: Metacognitive Insightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From another perspective, interoception has various dimensions, i.e. interoceptive accuracy (sensitivity), interoceptive sensibility, interoceptive awareness, and others [14,53,54]. Therefore, it is uncertain whether the conclusions drawn from experiments using one specific method, e.g.…”
Section: Differences From Somatic Symptoms Measured By the Tas-20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, we have focused on interoceptive accuracy, but there are other aspects of interoceptive ability that may be quantified using the HCT and HDT. In addition to accuracy it is now common for studies to obtain confidence ratings during tasks of interoceptive accuracy in order to assess both one's interoceptive sensibility (self-reported beliefs regarding interoceptive accuracy) and to calculate interoceptive awareness (a metacognitive measure reflecting the correspondence between interoceptive accuracy and interoceptive sensibility; Garfinkel et al, 2015;Murphy, Catmur, & Bird, 2019b). For both tasks, interoceptive sensibility is calculated by averaging the confidence ratings obtained across trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'confidence analysis' is named as such for clarity due to differences in the literature with regards to the naming structure of interoceptive abilities and the frequent use of the term 'sensibility' to relate to both confidence ratings and questionnaires of interoceptive sensibility which may index different abilities(Murphy et al, 2019b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%