2000
DOI: 10.2307/259261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
833
2
21

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(868 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
833
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, extant identity research has articulated that organizations use multiple identity claims to address the expectations of multiple audiences (Pratt and Foreman 2000). However, it has not examined how a multiplicity of claims relates to diversity in strategies and practices, and how aggregation and syncretisation of identity claims may increase an organization's strategic latitude.…”
Section: Strategic Use Of Cultural Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, extant identity research has articulated that organizations use multiple identity claims to address the expectations of multiple audiences (Pratt and Foreman 2000). However, it has not examined how a multiplicity of claims relates to diversity in strategies and practices, and how aggregation and syncretisation of identity claims may increase an organization's strategic latitude.…”
Section: Strategic Use Of Cultural Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, we indicate that, for these individuals, the decision to participate in commercial activity is akin to managing multiple identities (Pratt andForeman 2000 in George et al 2005) in order to signal that they have multiple skills and knowledge (both academic and industrial); and they are able to better respond to a variety of situations. Scientists are establishing a unique set of experiences and values that are closely linked to their roles and academic career.…”
Section: Cooperators Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akin to "blind spots", compartmentalization consists in "pigeonholing one's life into rigid and exclusive categories" (Monte, 1977, p. 665). This phenomenon flows from the fact that we arguably embrace multiple identities through our life, each being defined and influenced by the groups we interact with or the roles we perceive we ought to or wish to enact (Pratt and Foreman, 2000). We are not 'one self' but a "multiple self" (Elster, 1986), constantly managing or juggling with our various self-aspects to suit the social expectations and our own built-in expectations.…”
Section: Roles and Self: Whose Moral Responsibility?mentioning
confidence: 99%