1998
DOI: 10.1109/51.646221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying multichannel ECG patterns with an adaptive neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern diagnostic systems are a compromise between algorithms that require significant computational costs to achieve high accuracy of diagnostic, and hardware with limited performance. It has been established that the accuracy of arrhythmia recognition in existing solutions does not often exceed 80% [2,5,[10][11][12][13]17,20,25,38].…”
Section: Analysis Of Automatic Arrhythmia Diagnosis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern diagnostic systems are a compromise between algorithms that require significant computational costs to achieve high accuracy of diagnostic, and hardware with limited performance. It has been established that the accuracy of arrhythmia recognition in existing solutions does not often exceed 80% [2,5,[10][11][12][13]17,20,25,38].…”
Section: Analysis Of Automatic Arrhythmia Diagnosis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of ECG processing various algorithms have been reported specifically for the QRS complex such: Differentiation algorithms [2] Digital filters [5][6][7][8][9] Neural networks [10][11][12] In fact, most of the presented algorithms have a fundamental problem known as sensitivity to noise [13]. The problem of sensitivity to noise in ECG signal in itself is complex and because of that, in this paper, it is chosen six algorithms for preprocessing the electrocardiography in order to reduce noise before detecting R wave.…”
Section: Fig 1: Sample Ecg From Mit-bih Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of obtaining an electrocardiogram-derived respiration (EDR) signal is perhaps the most straightforward to implement; yet as outlined by Boyle et al (2009), it offers similar levels of performance to more complex techniques based on characteristics of beat morphology such as area under the QRS complex (Moody et al, 1985), amplitude of the R-wave (Khaled and Farges, 1992) and amplitude of the R-and S-waves (Mason and Tarassenko, 2001 The electrocardiogram-derived respiration (EDR) algorithm used here thus requires two main steps: detection of the QRS complexes and calculation of the variation in the R-R intervals between these QRS complexes. QRS detection is a well-established research area with popular algorithms based upon the derivative of the ECG signal (Pan and Tompkins, 1985), wavelets (Afonso et al, 1999), neural networks (Barro et al, 1998) amongst others. In this work, the wavelet-based QRS detection algorithm by Afonso et al (1999) was utilised using the Biosig toolbox in Matlab (Vidaurre et al, 2011).…”
Section: Electrocardiogram-derived Respiration Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%