1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1996.tb00377.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying Nursing‐Sensitive Patient Outcomes

Abstract: This report describes research at the University of Iowa College of Nursing to develop a comprehensive classification of nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. The Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes Classification (NOC) completes the nursing process elements of the Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS). We describe resolution of conceptual and methodological problems that define the inductive approach taken to develop the NOC. Strategies used to develop NOC included review of the literature, clinical databases and instruments;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The staffing data request excluded all non-productive hours such as annual leave, long service leave and leave without pay. [Irvine et al, 1998], [Johnson and Lass, 1997] and [Mass et al, 1996]). The nursing-sensitive outcomes in this study were derived according to the methodology developed by Needleman et al (2001).…”
Section: Data Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The staffing data request excluded all non-productive hours such as annual leave, long service leave and leave without pay. [Irvine et al, 1998], [Johnson and Lass, 1997] and [Mass et al, 1996]). The nursing-sensitive outcomes in this study were derived according to the methodology developed by Needleman et al (2001).…”
Section: Data Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buerhaus and Needleman (2000, p. 7) and Maas, Johnson, and Moorhead (1996) have been major contributors to the research to provide sound evidencebased measurements for indicating nurse sensitive patient outcomes. The McClosky and Diers study utilized the Needleman indicators to ascertain the level of variability on patient outcomes from nursing care in New Zealand hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANA-recognized, standardized nursing languages provide the comprehensive content for the 3 nursing clinical elements of the NMDS: the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) Classification (NANDA, 2001), 45 the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), 46 the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), [47][48][49][50] the Omaha System, 51 the Home Health Care Classification, 52 the Patient Care Data Set (PCDS), 53 the Perioperative Nursing Data Elements, 54 SnomedRT, 55 and the International Classification of Nursing Practice. 56,57 The Nursing Management Minimum Data Set (NMMDS), recognized by ANA in 1998, complements the NMDS by identifying contextual and structural factors that can affect quality.…”
Section: Nursing Classifications and Uniform Nursing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%