Classifying Pupils by Where They Live: How Well Does This Predict Variations in Their GCSE Results?

Abstract

This paper summarises key findings resulting from the appending of the neighbourhood classification system Mosaic to the records of the Pupil Level Annual School Census (PLASC) within the National Pupil Database (NPD) of the Department for Education and Skills (DfES). The most significant of these findings is that, other than the performance of the pupil at an earlier Key Stage test, the type of neighbourhood in which a pupil lives is a more reliable predictor of a pupil's GCSE performance than any other information held about that pupil on the PLASC database. Analysis then shows the extent to which the performance of pupils from any particular type of neighbourhood is also incrementally affected by the neighbourhoods from which the other pupils in the school they attend are drawn. It finds that whilst a pupil's exam performance is affected primarily by the social background of people he or she may encounter at home, the social background of fellow school pupils is of only marginally lower significance. These findings suggest that so long as pupils' GCSE performances are so strongly affected by the type of neighbourhood in which they live, a school's league position bears only indirect relationship to the quality of school management and teaching. A better measurement of the latter would be a league table system which took into account the geodemographic profile of each school's pupil intake. The paper concludes with discussion of the relevance of these findings to the sociology of education, to the debate on consumer choice in public services, to the general appropriateness of adjusting public-sector performance metrics to take into account the social mix of service users and to parental strategies in the educational sector in particular.

Area-Based Initiatives in England: Do They Have a Future?

“…Therefore, many of these children are missing the opportunity to obtain higher level qualifications, such as GCSEs which are crucial in accessing higher education or better job opportunities." (Whitworth et al 2009, 10) The mechanisms whereby concentrations of social disadvantage in an area become translated into poor educational outcomes are complex, contested, and may well vary from place to place (Webber and Butler 2007). However, Lupton's (2006) model of these interactions seems as good as any: The characteristics of places affect the individual learners who live in those places, by increasing the likelihood of problematic aspirations, low self-esteem, and limited parental support for education; these characteristics also affect the schools which serve those places in the form of internal stresses, recruitment difficulties, and poor quality provision; and the schools in turn compound the effects on individual learners through poor experiences and limited opportunities.…”

Geographies of education and the significance of children, youth and families

“…The question for us, then, is not simply how to make these studies more outwardlooking, but also how to develop their analyses of education as a vital sphere of social reproduction and inequality. Many of these studies are statistical in nature, some benefiting from advances in geo-demographic technique (Harris et al, 2007;Webber and Butler, 2007), and this form of work produces clear, if contested, analyses of social variation in access and attainment (Gibson and Asthana, 2000). The authors themselves note, however, that the correlations their studies produce do not necessarily equate to causality , and they need to be complemented by an equal weight of studies which used mixed or qualitative methods to untangle the processes which led to unequal provision and outcomes.…”

The UK Geography of the e-Society: A National Classification

“…Exposing the detail of such fragmentation extends our contribution beyond the creation of generalised pictures, to an understanding of spatial distributions that might suggest ways of engaging citizens with technologyösuch as Internet-based neighbourhood information systems (Burrows et al, 2005). The development and application of technology infrastructure have implications for the functioning of local government and the ways in which public services such as policing (Ashby et al, 2007), education (Webber, 2006), and health might respond to local needs and involve citizens in effective public service provision.…”