2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying the multi-omics data of gastric cancer using a deep feature selection method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main challenge of this method is that the data is highly dimensional, noisy, heterogeneous, and has a small sample size, and there will be data loss during processing ( 91 , 96 , 188 , 189 ). Here are some methods to address these barriers: T-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding, autoencoder, random forest deep feature selection, a stacked autoencoder, gradient descent method, multi-view factorization autoencoder, co-expression network analysis, and regulation techniques ( 88 , 91 , 114 , 190 193 ).…”
Section: Current Challenges and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge of this method is that the data is highly dimensional, noisy, heterogeneous, and has a small sample size, and there will be data loss during processing ( 91 , 96 , 188 , 189 ). Here are some methods to address these barriers: T-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding, autoencoder, random forest deep feature selection, a stacked autoencoder, gradient descent method, multi-view factorization autoencoder, co-expression network analysis, and regulation techniques ( 88 , 91 , 114 , 190 193 ).…”
Section: Current Challenges and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods primarily address the tasks of subtype clustering and prognostic analysis; that is, they do not require prior knowledge of sample phenotypes. With the availability of data sets containing detailed sample phenotype annotations on the rise, there is a growing interest in supervised approaches for integrating multiomics data, enabling accurate predictions on uncharacterized cases. , So far, supervised integration methods include: (1) early integration methods that concatenate matrices of different omics data types, such as RDFS, Stetson et al, and Fu et al, (2) intermediate integration methods that map diverse omics data into a shared space, such as MoGCN, and (3) late integration methods that combine predictions from different omics data types using ensemble learning, such as MOGONET and MOMA . Compared to other integration methods, early integration has become the most commonly used method , for the reasons that it preserves the attributes of biometric measurements and is easy to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, early integration encounters two primary challenges in its application: (1) The raw high-dimensional data generated by concatenating all omics data is intricate, noisy, and redundant, leading to challenging learning processes and suboptimal model performance. , Existing methods , often employ feature selection algorithms to reduce the complexity of the composite matrix, which results in information loss as certain useful information is filtered out during the selection process . (2) Another challenge lies in the fact that sequential high-dimensional multiomics vectors can hardly reflect the intrinsic correlations of omics-features from the representational level .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an autoencoder architecture, Chaudhary integrates multiomics data to predict hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) survival. Hu developed a random forest deep feature selection (RDFS) and approach to increase gastric cancer prediction accuracy by combining the gene expression and copy number variation data [11]. Based on multiomics ensemble data, Xu employed a bidirectional deep neural network (BiDNN) model to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%