2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying Transactional Addresses using Supervised Learning Approaches over Ethereum Blockchain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervised machine learning models, including linear, non-linear, and ensemble models classified harmful and non-harmful activities. This study showed that linear and non-linear machine learning outperformed ensemble learning in classifying Ethereum blockchain addresses [5]. All methodologies are contingent upon the availability and utilization of data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Supervised machine learning models, including linear, non-linear, and ensemble models classified harmful and non-harmful activities. This study showed that linear and non-linear machine learning outperformed ensemble learning in classifying Ethereum blockchain addresses [5]. All methodologies are contingent upon the availability and utilization of data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The authors used ML algorithms, including DT and SVM, to identify potentially fraudulent transactions based on the features extracted from the various transaction perspectives. The authors proposed a supervised learning approach in [27] that used various ML algorithms, including LR, DT, and SVM, to classify transactional addresses based on their transactional behavior. The authors used various features extracted from the transactional behavior, including the number of transactions, the transaction frequency, and the transaction value, to train the ML models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed SINN-RD [24] Accuracy, Recall and Precision Existing techniques do not tackle Blackbox issue Used LR, KNN, RF, and NN [25] ROC, F1score, Specificity and Recall Existing techniques are not efficient for handling big data Used SVM [26] Precision, Recall, F1-score and AUC Binary classification issue in cryptocurrency Used ML techniques (LR, KNN, NB, RF and XGBoost) [27] Accuracy, F1-score, Precision and Recall Limited accuracy and performance of individual classifiers Used SNN and optimizeable DT [29] Precision, Recall, F1-score, and AUC. Existing research do not concentrate on fraud detection Used RF and XGBoost [30] Accuracy, F1-score and AUC-ROC curve Issue in Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunneling Used SVM, KNN, NB and RF [32] MSE, TP and FP illicit activities in [31].…”
Section: Poor Performance Of Existing Techniques On Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [18] used supervised learning methods to classify malicious and nonmalicious addresses in Ethereum and found that linear and non-linear machine learning methods outperformed integrated learning methods for address classification. These studies do not separate the detection of various malicious activities.…”
Section: Graph Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%