2011
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classroom Application of a Trial‐based Functional Analysis

Abstract: We evaluated a trial-based approach to conducting functional analyses in classroom settings. Ten students referred for problem behavior were exposed to a series of assessment trials, which were interspersed among classroom activities throughout the day. Results of these trial-based functional analyses were compared to those of more traditional functional analyses. Outcomes of both assessments showed correspondence in 6 of the 10 cases and partial correspondence in a 7th case. Results of the standard functional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
213
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
213
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors may have led to more robust findings than could be expected with trainees who do not receive additional compensation or who have less experience in the field of behavior analysis. In addition, our training and interpretation of correct responses when conducting FA sessions were limited to the procedures outlined by Iwata et al (1982Iwata et al ( /1984, which may lack some generality given the multitude of variations that have been described in the literature since that initial publication (e.g., Bloom, Iwata, Fritz, Roscoe, & Carreau, 2011;Najdowski, Wallace, Ellsworth, MacEleese, & Cleveland, 2008). We were interested, however, in developing a training model for individuals who are not well-versed in FA methodologies, and thus, saw training of the original conditions as an appropriate starting point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors may have led to more robust findings than could be expected with trainees who do not receive additional compensation or who have less experience in the field of behavior analysis. In addition, our training and interpretation of correct responses when conducting FA sessions were limited to the procedures outlined by Iwata et al (1982Iwata et al ( /1984, which may lack some generality given the multitude of variations that have been described in the literature since that initial publication (e.g., Bloom, Iwata, Fritz, Roscoe, & Carreau, 2011;Najdowski, Wallace, Ellsworth, MacEleese, & Cleveland, 2008). We were interested, however, in developing a training model for individuals who are not well-versed in FA methodologies, and thus, saw training of the original conditions as an appropriate starting point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedure A trial-based functional analysis was conducted based on procedures described by Bloom, Iwata, Fritz, Roscoe, and Carreau (2011) with antecedent and consequence modifications based on Hagopian et al (2007). Each session of the FA consisted of sequential 2-min control-test trials.…”
Section: Trial-based Functional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the situation in which determination of function for a behavior with a sexual topography is necessary, BCBAs should consider alternate means of functional assessment, such as structural analysis [41], precursor analysis [42], brief functional analysis [43], and single-trial [44,45]. Clinicians must also consider that while sexual behavior has operant properties and is subject to behavioral interventions [32], it is inherently more complex than much of other operant behavior given interactions of hormones, possible medication side effects, social interaction, possible social positive reinforcement, and interaction with media depictions of sexuality combined with vicarious reinforcement, just to name a few.…”
Section: Intrusiveness Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%