2008
DOI: 10.1177/0263276408097810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Claude Lévi-Strauss at His Centennial

Abstract: Lévi-Strauss's centennial is an opportunity to show his inextricable connections with the evolution of 20th-century thought and what these promise for 21st-century anthropology. He has mapped the philosophical parameters for a renewed ethnography which opens innovative approaches to history, agency, culture and society. The anthropological understanding of history, for instance, is enriched by methodical application of his mytho-logical analysis, in particular his claim that myths are `machines for the suppres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet it is possible to show that structural anthropology may innovatively account for much more than the dynamics of social systems and the praxis of competitive and strategic behaviors, including the effectiveness of mass rapes as a military strategy and instrument of ethnic cleansing. Indeed, Lévi-Strauss anticipated and called for the advent of what must be the future of a theoretical anthropology to come [3][4][5][6][7]. Contrary to the received ideas of his critics, little of recent topical, ethical, methodological or epistemological interest escaped Lévi-Strauss's notice, understanding and engagement.…”
Section: Structural Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yet it is possible to show that structural anthropology may innovatively account for much more than the dynamics of social systems and the praxis of competitive and strategic behaviors, including the effectiveness of mass rapes as a military strategy and instrument of ethnic cleansing. Indeed, Lévi-Strauss anticipated and called for the advent of what must be the future of a theoretical anthropology to come [3][4][5][6][7]. Contrary to the received ideas of his critics, little of recent topical, ethical, methodological or epistemological interest escaped Lévi-Strauss's notice, understanding and engagement.…”
Section: Structural Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though this must claim further examination at another time, we may argue that such attempt could provide another instance in which our theoretical understanding of the world can be made to progress, in the context of a general revival of the kind of vigorous theoretical debate that tended to disappear from the field after the postmodern-poststructuralist turns in the 1980s. A thorough critique of the postmodernist rhetoric of post-structuralism [4,8,9], provided elsewhere in a broader context of the reassessment of structural legacy in anthropology [3,5,11], may be considered as a new step toward the innovative movement and reflexive project of neo-structural constructivism [6,7,12]. In particular, the theoretical project inspired by the canonical formalization in the structural analysis of myth can show that structural anthropology is intimately concerned with processes of social conflict, change, praxis and agency [13].…”
Section: Structural Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One example among others is that of the then-EU Commissioner for Enlargement who, in an address at the University of Sarajevo in 2005, advised the audience to leave blind nationalism behind and choose a European future, saying, 'I am sure you agree with me that it is high time that the Western Balkans can take a break and move from the production to the consumption of history!"' 10 The arrogance of this aphorism allows us to bring together the two aspects, the otherization of Southeast Europe and the misperception of Southeast European history, and problematize them by using Lévi-Strauss's mytho-logical thermal analysis of history (Doja 2005(Doja , 2006(Doja , 2008a(Doja , 2008b. His claim that myths are machines for the suppression of time and disorder at the level of history and social relations (Lévi-Strauss 1964, 24 [Eng.…”
Section: Mytho-logical Rationalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lévi-Strauss's sense, both European powers and primitive peoples might have managed to work out a reasonable way to insert the irrationality of war and calamity into some kind of rationality. By means of their own ceaseless logical transformations, as outlined elsewhere (Doja 2008a), in one case or another, myths generate the appearance of stability, an illusion of timelessness that cannot be affected by changes in the world. Therefore, the peace treaties, as processes of ongoing logical transformations of the system of international relations, also serve as a cooling mystification machine for the obliteration of hot history, 'even and particularly that which might be thought to defy the system' (Lévi-Strauss 1962, 323 [Eng.…”
Section: Mytho-logical Rationalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%