2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clay behavior following macroaggregate breakdown in Ferralsols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these previous studies, the positive effect of SOM on soil aggregate development was attributed to the increment in van der Waals force between soil particles. However, different from our study, Melo et al 12 reported that Londrina soil with high SOC released greater water dispersible clay (60–80%) than that in Rondon with low SOC (50–70%) after mechanical breakdown of macroaggregate. This was probably due to the repulsive force prevailing attractive force between soil particles as affected by more negative zeta potential or surface potential 8 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In these previous studies, the positive effect of SOM on soil aggregate development was attributed to the increment in van der Waals force between soil particles. However, different from our study, Melo et al 12 reported that Londrina soil with high SOC released greater water dispersible clay (60–80%) than that in Rondon with low SOC (50–70%) after mechanical breakdown of macroaggregate. This was probably due to the repulsive force prevailing attractive force between soil particles as affected by more negative zeta potential or surface potential 8 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The zeta potential of manure and NPK + straw treatments having high SOC agreed with earlier studies in Marchuk et al 9 that decreases of SOC via NaOH treatments decreased the negative zeta potential value 9 , where Claremont soil originally having high SOC (2.2%) displayed a greater degree of decline in negative zeta potential (from − 29 to − 34.9 mV) than Urrbrae having lower SOC (1.4%) (− 66.3 to − 68 mV). However, zeta potential in water dispersible clay responded to SOC contrastly in the study of Melo et al 12 , where Londrina soil with high SOC (5–20 g kg −1 ) displayed lower negative zeta potential values in water dispersible clay than that in Rondon soil (SOC 5 to 12 g kg −1 ) in subtropical Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Larger organic residues were manually removed before analysis. Additionally, sieves with 0.053 mm openings were not considered necessary because these soils do not disperse spontaneously in water [see Figure S2 in Melo et al (2021)]. The mean weighted diameter was calculated according to equation 2.…”
Section: Stability Of Aggregates In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%