2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-021-01685-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clay landslide movement triggered by artificial vibrations: new insights from monitoring data

Abstract: Slope stability is influenced by a number of factors that modify the resisting/acting force ratio control landslide initiation and movement velocity. Among these, artificial vibrations have been identified as an important degrading factor for soil strength, but it is not fully clear if they can trigger or modulate movements of clay landslides. To contribute to a better understanding of the potential effect of vibrations on landslide movement, also in terms of boundary conditions, we analyzed monitoring data ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By simultaneously monitoring both processes and conditions with the same data, one can more robustly link changing subsurface characteristics to geomorphic processes (e.g., Dietze et al 2020a). In addition, many of the external processes that force geomorphic events can also be observed with seismic data, such as heavy rainfall (Roth et al 2016), wind (Withers et al 1996), earthquakes, and anthropogenic activity (Guerriero et al 2021). Thus, well-designed seismic networks have the potential to simultaneously address each of the three areas described above-the triggering of discrete geomorphic events, their internal dynamics, and their impact in terms of sediment flux out of a catchment-while at the same time monitoring subsurface properties and some types of external forcing.…”
Section: Integrative Geomorphic System Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By simultaneously monitoring both processes and conditions with the same data, one can more robustly link changing subsurface characteristics to geomorphic processes (e.g., Dietze et al 2020a). In addition, many of the external processes that force geomorphic events can also be observed with seismic data, such as heavy rainfall (Roth et al 2016), wind (Withers et al 1996), earthquakes, and anthropogenic activity (Guerriero et al 2021). Thus, well-designed seismic networks have the potential to simultaneously address each of the three areas described above-the triggering of discrete geomorphic events, their internal dynamics, and their impact in terms of sediment flux out of a catchment-while at the same time monitoring subsurface properties and some types of external forcing.…”
Section: Integrative Geomorphic System Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T-InSAR displacement data between 21 and 22 April 2016 were also coherent with wire extensometer displacement data recorded in the same period at the site of the Pietrafitta earth flow. This instrument, used a seismic station, was installed along the left flank in Sector 3, in the context of the experiment conducted by [62], which aimed to demonstrate that, after 4-5 h of the night closure, the landslide movement stopped and then restarted simultaneously with the road day opening. This test proved that, even in the absence of rainfall events, the vibration induced by vehicle traffic acts as a trigger event of movement when geotechnical and geomorphological settings create ideal conditions for slope failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landslides induced by external dynamical effects are common natural phenomena: there are many contemporary examples of massive landslides triggered by earthquakes [1][2][3], volcanic activity [4], or artificial vibrations [5,6]. The mechanism of the dynamically triggered events is obvious: if the impact is strong, then the intensity of the vibrations themselves is causing the soil failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%