2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

cLD: Rare-variant linkage disequilibrium between genomic regions identifies novel genomic interactions

Dinghao Wang,
Deshan Perera,
Jingni He
et al.

Abstract: Linkage disequilibrium (LD) is a fundamental concept in genetics; critical for studying genetic associations and molecular evolution. However, LD measurements are only reliable for common genetic variants, leaving low-frequency variants unanalyzed. In this work, we introduce cumulative LD (cLD), a stable statistic that captures the rare-variant LD between genetic regions, which reflects more biological interactions between variants, in addition to lack of recombination. We derived the theoretical variance of c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the same simulation parameter setting, the in-sample estimation precision with SNPs has low MAFs is lower than that for SNPs with MAF > 0.05 for both LDER-GE and LDSC-based methods. While the out-sample performance of LDER-GE degrades with the inclusion of SNPs with low MAFs in terms of bias and accuracy, due to unreliable LD estimates from the small sample size of the 1000 Genomes project [ 23 ]. We recommend use MAF > 0.05 variants and an in-sample or a large sample size reference panel where applicable to ensure the best overall estimation performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the same simulation parameter setting, the in-sample estimation precision with SNPs has low MAFs is lower than that for SNPs with MAF > 0.05 for both LDER-GE and LDSC-based methods. While the out-sample performance of LDER-GE degrades with the inclusion of SNPs with low MAFs in terms of bias and accuracy, due to unreliable LD estimates from the small sample size of the 1000 Genomes project [ 23 ]. We recommend use MAF > 0.05 variants and an in-sample or a large sample size reference panel where applicable to ensure the best overall estimation performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%