2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleanroom energy efficiency strategies: Modeling and simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation-based approaches are available to support the development of different measures (Chow, 1996;Andreassi et al, 2009;Wischhusen et al, 2003;Rebhan, 2002;Kircher et al, 2010). dimensioning, materials, usage of energy efficient components, detail design of tubes etc), an efficient process control (e.g.…”
Section: Supporting Processes Including Technical Building Services (mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation-based approaches are available to support the development of different measures (Chow, 1996;Andreassi et al, 2009;Wischhusen et al, 2003;Rebhan, 2002;Kircher et al, 2010). dimensioning, materials, usage of energy efficient components, detail design of tubes etc), an efficient process control (e.g.…”
Section: Supporting Processes Including Technical Building Services (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This excludes pure mathematical (optimisation) models (e.g. Kircher et al, 2010;Wischhusen et al, 2003;Andreassi, 2009). agriculture Neumann, 1985, chemical/process engineering Mark et al, 2009).…”
Section: Procedures and Limitations Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1990s, the laminar flow cleanroom with product expose in cleanroom environment was replaced by using SMIF pod and mini-environment in a nonunidirectional cleanroom, the yield is significantly improved [18]. A cleanrooms with ISO Class 7 or less low cleanliness levels have adopted the ceiling-return arrangement, which presents fewer physical barriers and more construction flexibilities when compared with traditional wall-return arrangements especially for the cases in which locations of individual tools or layouts of production lines were to be changed from time to time [19]. Some literatures about the energy performances of cleanroom air-conditioning components such as FFU [20][21][22], make-up air (MAU) [23][24][25], chill water system [26,27] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a huge volume of recirculation air flow rate, a proper design on the air path can reduce airflow resistance and therefore increase the energy efficiency significantly [4]. Over the years, many, many articles addressed the opportunities to reduce energy [5][6][7][8] and construction cost [9][10][11]. A wall-return air recirculation system is traditionally used for ISO Class 6 through ISO Class 9 industrial cleanrooms [12], Class C and Class D pharmaceutical cleanrooms, and operation rooms in hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roulet et al [13] studied real heat recovery with air handling units and Bartholomew [14] investigated recovery of heat from make-up air from exhaust in labs, but neither reported energy-saving opportunities in cooling. Kircher et al [15] conducted a simulation and modeling of a 1600 m 2 university laboratory cleanroom in upstate New York using the TRNSYS model [16] with TMY2 weather data [17]. However, none of the above discussed energy efficiency of individual components of MAU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%