Clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCAC) of uterine cervix is very rare tumor and only 4%-9% of entire adenocarcinoma appears to be diagnosed as clear cell type. Risk factors and pathogenesis of this disease are not exactly revealed. The intrauterine exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) and associated non-steroidal estrogen during pregnancy before 18 weeks is the only known risk factor, and also hormonal changes or genetic causes are suggested as the risk factors. We report a case of CCAC in the uterine cervix of 52-year-old virgin who had never been exposed to DES, with a brief review of related literature.
Copyright © 2012. Korean Society of Obstetrics and GynecologyClear cell adenocarcinoma (CCAC) of the uterine cervix is a rare disease accounting for only 4% of all adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix. Though the etiology and pathogenesis are not clear, several studies have linked the occurrence of vaginal CCAC in young women with intrauterine exposure to the synthetic nonsteroidal estrogenic hormone, diethylstilbestrol (DES). Other factors reported to be associated with the development of CCAC are microsatellite instability, human papillomavirus infection, bcl-2 protein overexpression, and p53 gene mutation. CCAC is refractory to chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and its prognosis is poorer than that of squamous cell carcinoma of the same organ. We experienced a case of CCAC in the uterine cervix of 52-yearold virgin who had never been exposed to DES and report this case with a brief review of related literature.
Case ReportA 52-year-old woman had suffered vaginal spotting for about 3 months. She visited a local gynecologist and liquid based cytology (Papanicolaou smear) was done at uterine cervix by the gynecologist. The cytology showed atypical endocervical cells that favored neoplastic changes, which then she was referred to our outpatient department for further evaluation and management. She had no history of coitus and had never been exposed to in utero exogenous steroid hormone. The vaginal examination and inspection showed caulifl ower-like mass of the cervix (Fig. 1). On rectal examination, the left parametrium was free and right parametrium was moderately thickened. High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test at uterine cervix done by hybrid capture II was negative. Histological diagnosis by punch biopsy was CCAC of the uterine cervix. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a solid mass, 1.6×2.9×2.5 cm in diameter (Fig. 2). This solid mass was protruding from the posterior lip of the cervix and extending to the upper vagina. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography was also performed, and there was evidence of tumor expansion neither to parametrium nor to endometrium. No involvement of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes was found. Parameters from blood chemistry studies and the levels of tumor markers were all CASE REPORT Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2012;55(3):192-196 http://dx